Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

GAO Says CMS Must Do More to Protect Medicare Info

By Dena M. Castricone on April 11, 2018
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

In a report released on April 5, 2018, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) concluded that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has not done enough to adequately protect the electronic data of Medicare beneficiaries.  There are over 59 million Medicare beneficiaries and beneficiary information contains some of the most sensitive personal information, making it very attractive to criminals.  Therefore, CMS’s protection of that data is critically important.

In its report, the GAO identified two failures regarding external entities with access to Medicare beneficiary data. First, it found that CMS failed to develop guidance for researchers on assessing security risks and implementing controls to address identified risks.  Researchers are one of three external groups with access to Medicare beneficiary information.  The other two groups are Medicare contractors and qualified entities (qualified entities receive data under the Affordable Care Act to evaluate the performance of providers and suppliers).  CMS has guidance for these two groups.  Without providing researchers with guidance, CMS leaves them to their own devices to determine risk and implement security measures.

Second, the GAO concluded that CMS does not have an oversight program to ensure that researchers and qualified entities have implemented adequate security measures. CMS has an oversight program for Medicare contractors.  Without the oversight program, CMS cannot confirm that researchers and qualified entities are adequately protecting Medicare beneficiary data.

In light of these findings, CMS may look to extend its existing guidance and oversight programs to ensure that all external groups with access to Medicare beneficiary data are covered.

Photo of Dena M. Castricone Dena M. Castricone

Dena M. Castricone, CIPP/US is the chair of the Privacy and Cybersecurity group and a member of the Long Term Care and Health Care groups.  She also serves as Chair of the firm’s Women Expanding Business initiative and co-chair of the firm’s Pro…

Dena M. Castricone, CIPP/US is the chair of the Privacy and Cybersecurity group and a member of the Long Term Care and Health Care groups.  She also serves as Chair of the firm’s Women Expanding Business initiative and co-chair of the firm’s Pro Bono Committee.  Prior to joining Murtha Cullina, Dena served as a law clerk to the Chief Justice of the Rhode Island Supreme Court, Frank J. Williams.

As the Chair of the Privacy and Cybersecurity group and a Certified Information Privacy Professional (CIPP/US), Dena provides the full complement of data breach coaching services to business and health care clients including breach notification to individuals and various government entities.  Related to data breaches, she also counsels clients on the creation of information security, incident response plans and other proactive measures.  Additionally, Dena advises clients on compliance with state, federal and international privacy laws including the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) as well as many others. Dena has written extensively on privacy and cybersecurity issues and she is the Co-Editor of Privacy and Cybersecurity Perspectives.  Read More

Read more about Dena M. CastriconeEmailDena M.'s Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Health Care and Life Sciences, Privacy and Cybersecurity
  • Blog:
    Privacy and Cybersecurity Perspectives
  • Organization:
    Murtha Cullina LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo