Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Enforcement of an Arbitration Clause is for the Court not Arbitrator to Determine

By Michael Simkin on August 8, 2018
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

In an unpublished opinion, Milder v. Holley, B267974 (2/5 1/31/17) the Court of Appeal on a gateway issue, found that a judge decides if there was fraud in the inducement to enter into an arbitration agreement in California.  ( Citing Johnson v. Siegel (2000) 84 Cal.App.4th 1087, 1095.)  This is separate from fraudulent inducement to enter into the contract which happens to contain an arbitration clause.  The latter is to be decided by the arbitrator. (Citing Ericksen, Arbuthnot, McCarthy, Kearney & Walsh Inc. v. 100 Oak Street, (1983) 35 Cal.3d 312, 323.)  Read more …

In this action Milder sued his former attorney Holley and her law firm Kinsella Weitzman Iser Kump & Aldisert in connection with legal representation. Great Job Mr. Milder for teaching a famous law firm a lesson!  See more  here, but note that the arbitration award was actually $39,812!https://www.publicjustice.net/celebrity-attorney-faces-fight-over-arbitration-clause-in-retainer/

  • Posted in:
    Arbitration and ADR
  • Blog:
    Legal Secrets
  • Organization:
    Simkin & Associates
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo