In response to President Trump’s Executive Order re-imposing certain Iran-related sanctions, summarized in our recent post, the EU has expanded the scope of the EU Blocking Statute to cover certain US Iran-focused sanctions.  On August 7, immediately following the US government’s re-imposition of certain Iran-related sanctions, the Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/1100 amending the annex to the EU Blocking Statute was published in the EU Official Journal and entered into force.

In addition to the Delegated Regulation, the following two texts relating to the application of the Blocking Statute were published in the EU Official Journal:

  • Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1101 which sets out: (i) the process for applying to the Commission for an authorization permitting full or partial compliance with the relevant US sanctions; and (ii) a non-exhaustive list of criteria that the Commission will consider in assessing whether an authorization should be granted; and
  • The Commission’s Guidance Note with non-binding guidance on the application of the revised Blocking Statute. The non-binding guidance covers various aspects of the Blocking Statute, including persons/entities within the scope of the Blocking Statute, its temporal application, effects of the Blocking Statute, recovery of damages arising from the application of US Iran-related sanctions, authorizations to comply with US Iran-related sanctions, etc.

US Iran-Related Sanctions Within the Scope of the Blocking Statute

As noted in our recent post, the amended annex adds within the scope of the Blocking Statute certain US Iran-related secondary sanctions that have extraterritorial application and that previously had been lifted as part of the Iran nuclear deal.

In addition, the amended annex to the Blocking Statute adds to its scope US primary sanctions under the Iranian Transactions and Sanctions Regulations (ITSR). It appears, therefore, that the expansion of the Blocking Statue includes ITSR provisions that had remained in effect even while the US government was participating in the JCPOA. This aspect of the expansion is particularly notable, because it prohibits EU companies from complying with the longstanding ITSR requirements “[n]ot to reexport any goods, technology or services that (a) have been exported from the USA and (b) are subject to export controls rules in the USA, if the export is made knowing or having reason to know that it is specifically intended for Iran or its Government.” However, under US law, knowingly engaging in such prohibited reexports potentially can subject an EU company to US civil and criminal penalties.

With the re-imposition of certain US sanctions targeting Iran, and the expansion of the Blocking Statute, many companies incorporated in the EU with Iran-related interests may find themselves facing a direct “conflict of laws” scenario.

Temporal Application of the Blocking Statute

The Guidance Note confirms that the amended Blocking Statute applies to EU operators from August 7, i.e. there is no retroactive application. The guidance also clarifies that the Blocking Statute applies to contractual obligations entered into before August 7. Therefore:

  • If an EU operator currently has activities in Iran, termination of its business in the country on or after August 7 in order to comply with the relevant US sanctions against Iran would require an authorization from the Commission in order to avoid a breach of the Blocking Statute.
  • If an EU operator had activities in Iran, but fully terminated its business (for example, terminated relevant contracts) before August 7 for any reason, that EU operator should not be subject to the requirements of the Blocking Statute.
  • It is not clear how the Blocking Statute applies to EU operators which ceased their Iran-related activities before August 7, but still must take additional actions on or after August 7 to wind down Iran-related investments or contractual relationships. We expect that these wind-down activities may be assessed on a case-by-case basis. It is possible that they might be interpreted to fall within the scope of the Blocking Statute, in particular where an EU operator had taken no or only limited active steps to terminate its Iran-related activities before August 7.

Business Decisions of EU Operators Based on Assessment of the Economic Situation

The Commission recognizes that EU operators are free to make business decisions to start, continue, or cease business operations in Iran “on the basis of their assessment of the economic situation.” Such guidance suggests that EU operators are able to cease their Iran-related activities for genuine economic reasons (for example, no access to financing, AML concerns, no access to US inputs required for production, etc.).

Notification of Effects of US Iran-Related Sanctions

Under the Blocking Statute, EU operators must notify the Commission or their Member State of incorporation whenever the US Iran-related sanctions directly or indirectly affect the economic or financial interests of the EU operator. The notification process is intended to allow the Commission to understand more clearly the impact of Iran-related sanctions on EU operators. An EU operator is required to provide the relevant information within 30 days from the date on which it obtained such information. The Commission could request additional relevant information.

The Commission’s Guidance Note clarifies that, in case of an EU company (legal person), the notification obligation applies to “directors, managers and other persons with management responsibilities.” However, the Guidance Note does not elaborate further on the circumstances that would trigger the obligation to notify either the Commission or the relevant Member State. Therefore, it is left for each EU operator to determine whether and when its economic or financial interests have been affected by the application of US Iran-related sanctions.

Authorization to Comply with US Iran-Related Sanctions

The Implementing Regulation and the Guidance Note provide further details regarding how EU operators can seek an authorization to comply with US Iran-related sanctions:

  • EU operators have the right to apply to the Commission for an authorization to comply with US Iran-related sanctions “if not doing so would actually damage their interests or those of the Union.” The damage has to be “serious.” The Implementing Regulation sets out a non-exhaustive list of non-cumulative criteria that the Commission will use to determine whether “serious damage” to the interests of EU operators or the EU itself would arise. Each of those listed criteria may find application in the specific circumstances surrounding the applicant.
  • EU operators cannot use the authorization procedure to obtain the Commission’s confirmation that an EU operator’s conduct does not constitute compliance with the relevant Iran-related sanctions (so-called “letters of comfort”).
  • In the application for authorization, the applicant will need to specify the provisions of the relevant US sanctions laws with which they would need to comply and “what exactly the behavior is they would seek to engage in.”
  • Neither the Implementing Regulation, nor the Guidance Note indicates the timeframe within which the Commission will assess requests for authorization. The Commission merely states that it will try to process applications and reply to applicants “as swiftly as possible.” We expect that the assessment period will depend on the actual number and complexity of applications received by the Commission.
  • The request for authorization does not suspend the application of the Blocking Statute. Therefore, while the Commission assesses the application, the EU operator would be in breach of the Blocking Statute if they were to comply with the US Iran-related sanctions; however, proceeding with the Iran-related activity could result in liability or secondary sanctions risk under the US-government’s Iran-related sanctions. As a result, it is possible that companies may find themselves caught between two conflicting legal regimes.

Overall, the Implementing Regulation and the Commission’s guidance suggest that EU operators should view requests for authorization as a last-resort measure where an EU operator has exhausted all other options to avoid potential serious damage to its interests due to non-compliance with US Iran-related sanctions (in line with the requirements of the Blocking Statute).

Requests for Licenses from US Authorities

According to the Commission, an EU operator may not, absent authorization from the Commission, request an individual license granting a derogation/exemption from the relevant Iran-related sanctions from the US authorities as doing so would constitute compliance with those Iran-related sanctions. Before requesting such individual license from US authorities, an EU operator would need to obtain a Commission authorization to comply with Iran-related sanctions in accordance with the process set out in the Blocking Statute. It is not clear from the guidance whether the prohibition on requesting individual licenses covers only individual licenses under the US primary Iran-related sanctions, or whether it also covers waivers of the Iran-related secondary sanctions for particular transactions or projects.

However, according to the guidance, EU operators may engage in simple conversations with the US authorities in order “to ascertain its exact extent, how it might impact on them and whether not complying with it might entail serious damage on their interests.”

View Original Source
Print:
EmailTweetLikeLinkedInGoogle Plus
Photo of Guy Soussan Guy Soussan

Guy Soussan advises clients on various aspects of EU and French export control regulations, including controls and licensing regimes for both military and commercial products and technologies. His export practice covers compliance development and implementation, internal investigations, and enforcement matters, including voluntary disclosures. He also provides advice and assistance with EU economic sanctions targeting specific countries such as Iran, Libya, Syria, and most recently, Ukraine and Russia. His experience covers a wide range of industries, including manufacturing, energy, telecommunications, banking and insurance, petroleum and petro-chemicals, aerospace, and defense. He has conducted internal compliance audits, provided assistance on company compliance programs, and counseled clients on the application of the rules to specific transactions.

Read Guy’s full bio.

Photo of Meredith Rathbone Meredith Rathbone

Meredith Rathbone focuses on export controls and economic sanctions, and has assisted clients in the energy, manufacturing, telecommunications, information security, banking, insurance, pharmaceutical, and service industries, among many others, in navigating the requirements of the Export Administration Regulations (EAR), International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) and US sanctions regulations administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) and US Department of State. She regularly assists companies in developing compliance policies, conducting internal investigations, performing training, and conducting due diligence in M&A transactions. She has represented individuals and companies facing civil and criminal investigations in this area, and has also represented clients in their efforts to be removed from OFAC’s list of Specially Designated Nationals (SDNs). She is a frequent writer and speaker on export controls and sanctions topics. She is the co-chair of the American Bar Association’s Export Controls and Economic Sanctions Committee, and also serves on the Sanctions Subcommittee of the State Department’s Advisory Committee on International Economic Policy.

Read Meredith’s full bio.