Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Seattle Delays I-124 Medical Requirements      

By Bernice Blessing on September 13, 2018
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
logo-og-3.png

In August 2018, the ERISA Industry Committee (“ERIC”) brought the lawsuit challenging Part 3 of I-124.  ERIC asserts that Section 3’s provisions are preempted by the federal benefits law known as ERISA.  The City and ERIC have stipulated to an agreement that the City of Seattle will not enforce Part 3 of the law through the end of 2018 while they navigate litigation of the issue in federal court. 

Hoteliers impacted by I-124 should take heed that the City will continue to enforce all other aspects of I-124.  Further, while the City has elected not to pursue enforcement of Part 3 at this time, employees are still entitled to pursue lawsuits directly through the courts rather than seek enforcement by the City of Seattle.  Finally, should the courts find that Part 3 is not preempted by ERISA, hotel employers could still face penalties if they fail to comply with Part 3’s provisions, primarily failing to pay subsidies to eligible employees. Penalties can range from $100 to $1,000 per day and may be applied retroactively to cover any periods of noncompliance.

  • Posted in:
    Other
  • Blog:
    Duff on Hospitality Law
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo