Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

TSCA Chemical Inventory “Reset” Reporting Deadline: October 5

By Joseph J. Green on October 3, 2018
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Reminder that Friday is the deadline for chemical  “processors” to file notifications with EPA to ensure that the chemicals they use are designated as “active” substances on the TSCA Inventory.  “Active” designation is important as chemicals that are “inactive” will be treated as new chemicals for which pre-manufacture (or pre-import) notification and safety determination requirements will apply.  Many, if not most, chemicals in use in the U.S. likely already have been reported, but if you have not checked the EPA database of chemicals for which notifications already have been received, you should consider doing so now to avoid unanticipated supply disruptions.

EPA intends to issue the first TSCA Inventory with all substances designated as “active” or “inactive” within a few months after the October 5 reporting deadline.

For further information on the TSCA Inventory “reset” effort, please see my prior post below.

Chemical “Reset”: Make Sure the Substances You Manufacture, Import or Use Are EPA “Active”

 

Photo of Joseph J. Green Joseph J. Green

Email
(202) 342-8849
Bio

Read more about Joseph J. GreenEmailJoseph's Linkedin Profile
  • Posted in:
    Environmental and Climate
  • Blog:
    Kelley Green Law
  • Organization:
    Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo