Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Voters Reject Some State Ballot Initiatives on Clean Power and Deregulation

By Sidney Villanueva & Russell Kooistra on November 12, 2018
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On November 6, 2018, clean energy ballot initiatives failed in several states.  In particular, voters rejected Arizona’s 50 percent renewable energy mandate, Washington’s fee on carbon emissions, Colorado’s limits on oil and gas drilling and Nevada’s retail choice initiative.  However, voters passed Nevada’s 50 percent renewable energy portfolio.

Washington’s attempt at being the first state to implement a carbon tax (“Initiative 1631”) was rejected by voters.  The initiative would have set a carbon price of $15/metric ton on fossil-fuel emissions.  56.3 percent of voters opposed Initiative 1631, while 43.7 percent voted in favor of the initiative.  Similarly, Colorado’s attempt to limit oil and gas drilling (“Proposition 112”) was also rejected by voters.  Proposition 112 would have required oil and gas drilling to be further distanced from homes, businesses and waterways; Colorado voters rejected the proposition by a 57 percent-to-43 percent vote.  In Arizona, voters rejected a renewable energy mandate (“Proposition 127”), providing a decisive win (70-30) to the state’s existing power system.  Proposition 127 would have required Arizona utilities to source 50 percent of its power from renewable energy resources by 2030.

Because certain Nevada state initiatives require a second approval by voters, two important ballots were at play this year.  First, in 2016, Nevada voters initially approved a retail choice bill (“Question 3”).  Although Question 3 passed nearly two to one in 2016, its follow up vote was rejected by voters last Tuesday.  Second, Nevada voters passed initial approval for a 50 percent renewable energy mandate (“Question 6”).  Voters will need to pass Question 6 again in 2020 in order for the initiative to take effect.

Photo of Russell Kooistra Russell Kooistra

Russell Kooistra counsels an array of energy companies on various issues related to natural gas and electricity markets. Russell uses his in-depth knowledge of Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) policy and regulations to advise clients on complex regulatory matters.

Read more about Russell KooistraEmail
  • Posted in:
    Energy and Utilities
  • Blog:
    Washington Energy Report
  • Organization:
    Troutman Pepper Locke
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo