Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

FERC Proposes Notice Requirement For Public Utility Mergers and Acquisitions Under New Monetary Threshold

By Bud Earley on November 16, 2018
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

A recent amendment to the Federal Power Act (FPA) that will become effective March 27, 2019 sets a $10 million threshold for requiring Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) prior approval of public utility mergers and consolidations.  That amendment also calls for FERC to adopt a rule requiring public utilities to simply notify FERC of mergers and consolidations with a value over $1 million but less than $10 million.  At its recent public meeting, FERC approved a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NOPR) regarding that notice requirement.  These provisions, when in effect, will place mergers and consolidations under the same value threshold as other types of transactions and eliminate the need for low-value mergers and consolidations to secure FERC approval.  These legislative and regulatory changes will be of interest to entities that anticipate merging or consolidating facilities that are subject to the jurisdiction of FERC.

Statutory Background

The currently applicable section 203(a)(1) of the FPA requires prior FERC approval of the following types of transactions by public utilities: (a) sale, lease or other disposition of jurisdictional facilities; (b) merger or consolidation of facilities; (c) purchase or acquisition of securities; and (d) purchase, lease or acquisition of existing generation facilities.  With the exception of mergers and  consolidations, the FPA now sets a minimum value threshold of $10 million to trigger the FERC prior approval requirement; no threshold is specified for mergers and consolidations.  Accordingly, FERC has required prior approval of all mergers and consolidations, no matter how low the value of the facilities to be acquired in the transaction.

Public Law No. 115-247 rectifies this by amending FPA section 203(a)(1)(B) to require FERC prior approval of mergers and consolidations only when the facilities to be acquired have a value of over $10 million.  Where the facilities to be acquired have a value of less than $10 million but over $1 million, the transaction would be subject to a simple notification requirement after consummation.  In Congressional testimony, FERC’s General Counsel said transactions below the $10 million threshold are unlikely to impose a significant negative impact on competition or customer rates.

The amended FPA requires FERC to adopt a rule regarding the notification requirement and to submit a report to Congress in two years assessing the effects of the revisions to the FPA.  The notification requirement is the subject of FERC’s action discussed below.

The Proposed Notification Requirement

FERC’s proposal requires a public utility to notify the Commission of any merger or consolidation with a value of less than $10 million but more than $1 million not later than 30 days after the transaction is consummated.  The notice must provide a narrative description of the transaction, including:

  • The identity of all parties involved in the transaction and all jurisdictional facilities associated with or affected by the transaction,
  • The location of such jurisdictional facilities involved in the transaction,
  • The date on which the transaction was consummated,
  • The consideration for the transaction, and
  • The effect of the transaction on the ownership and control of such jurisdictional facilities.

In the NOPR, FERC says this information is a substantial reduction in paperwork from the full filing requirements for acquisitions and will allow the Commission to monitor the merger or consolidation of facilities subject to its jurisdiction.

Comments on FERC’s proposal (Docket No. RM19-4) are due 30 days after publication in the Federal Register.

 

 

Photo of Bud Earley Bud Earley

Bud Earley, a non-lawyer senior advisor, provides analysis and advice on a wide range of federal and state energy regulatory issues, including transaction and rate issues, regional transmission organization (RTO) tariffs and rules, interconnection, retail choice and demand response for electricity customers…

Bud Earley, a non-lawyer senior advisor, provides analysis and advice on a wide range of federal and state energy regulatory issues, including transaction and rate issues, regional transmission organization (RTO) tariffs and rules, interconnection, retail choice and demand response for electricity customers, a natural gas pipelines and hydroelectric facility licenses, and LNG export authorizations.

Working with Covington teams, Mr. Earley has provided expert advice and analysis to investment firms, utilities, independent power producers, project developers, customers, marketers and U.S. and international energy companies,

Prior to joining Covington, Mr. Earley served for over 30 years in various staff positions at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). While at the FERC, Mr. Earley was instrumental in developing and applying policies regarding the transition of the electric utility industry to competition, including policies regarding independent power producers, transmission access, standard generator interconnection procedures, organized electricity markets, mergers and market-based rates.

Read more about Bud EarleyEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Energy and Utilities
  • Organization:
    Covington & Burling LLP

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo