Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
CommunitySub-MenuPublishersChannelsProductsSub-MenuBlog ProBlog PlusBlog PremierMicrositeSyndication PortalsAboutContactResourcesSubscribeSupport
Join
Search
Close

Administration Moves Toward Strengthening Export Controls and Investment Restrictions on “Emerging Technologies”

By Brian Egan & Judy Wang on November 20, 2018
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Yesterday the US Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) took its first step towards a potentially significant expansion of US export controls by publishing a Federal Register notice soliciting public comments on how the US government should regulate the export of “emerging technologies.” Under the Export Controls Reform Act of 2018 (ECRA), “emerging and foundational technologies” will be subject to additional export controls and will trigger heightened foreign investment reviews for US companies that produce or develop these technologies.  Commerce has requested public comments on the “criteria for defining and identifying emerging technologies” by December 19, 2018.  Commerce will begin a separate comment process regarding “foundational technologies” at a later date.

Export Controls

BIS regulates the export of “dual-use” and less sensitive military items through the Commerce Control List (CCL) and the Export Administration Regulations (EAR). Section 1758 of the ECRA, enacted in August 2018 as a part of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019, requires BIS to establish “appropriate controls” for the export, re-export, or in-country transfer of “emerging and foundational technologies” that “are essential to the national security of the United States” but are not yet subject to US export controls.  While Commerce will have the discretion to set the level of export controls for any identified emerging and foundational technologies, at a minimum it must require a license for the export of these technologies to countries subject to a US arms embargo. (Section 126.1 of the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) identifies several countries, including China, currently subject to an arms embargo by the United States.)

Foreign Investments

The identification of emerging technologies also will have implications for inbound foreign investments, as investments in US companies that produce or develop these technologies may be subject to increased scrutiny under the “pilot program” created by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) pursuant to the Foreign Investment Risk Review Modernization Act of 2018 (FIRRMA).  Under FIRRMA’s Pilot Program, which was announced October 10, 2018 and entered into force on November 10, 2018, foreign investors in a US business that produces, designs, tests, manufactures, fabricates, or develops an “emerging and foundational technology” (or any other “critical technology”) used or designed for use in one of 27 identified Pilot Program industries must file declarations with CFIUS and seek CFIUS’s approval, if the foreign investor acquires control, access to “material non-public technical information,” board of director or equivalent rights, or other involvement in certain substantive decision-making by the US company. For additional analysis of the CFIUS Pilot Program, see our previous post here.

Comment Process for Emerging Technologies

BIS’s notice lists 14 broad categories of technology on which the agency intends to focus in determining whether there are any specific emerging technologies that merit control:

  • Biotechnology;
  • Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning technology;
  • Position, Navigation, and Timing (PNT) technology;
  • Microprocessor technology;
  • Advanced computing technology;
  • Data analytics technology;
  • Quantum information and sensing technology;
  • Logistics technology;
  • Additive manufacturing;
  • Robotics;
  • Brain-computer interfaces;
  • Hypersonics;
  • Advanced materials; and
  • Advanced surveillance technologies.

BIS is seeking public comments on seven specific topics: (1) how to define emerging technology to assist identification of such technology in the future; (2) criteria to apply to determine whether there are specific technologies within the 14 general categories that are important to US national security; (3) sources to identify such technologies; (4) other general technology categories that warrant review to identify emerging technology that are important to US national security; (5) the status of development of these technologies in the United States and other countries; (6) the impact specific emerging technology controls would have on US technological leadership; (7) any other approaches to the issue of identifying emerging technologies important to US national security. BIS anticipates that this process ultimately will lead to “proposed rules for new Export Control Classification Numbers (ECCNs) on the CCL” that will cover any identified emerging technologies.

Conclusion

The definition and identification of “emerging technologies” could have broad implications for US export controls and foreign investments, and we anticipate that BIS will carefully review the public input that it receives as part of its process for creating regulations on this topic.

If you would like additional information or have any questions about this posting, please contact one of the above-listed authors. As always, we will keep you abreast of additional developments in this space.

Photo of Brian Egan Brian Egan

Brian Egan advises on a number of international legal issues that affect US and foreign clients, including economic sanctions, export controls, and anti-money laundering programs; national security trade and investment reviews; international arbitration and other cross-border disputes; international cybersecurity and data privacy; and…

Brian Egan advises on a number of international legal issues that affect US and foreign clients, including economic sanctions, export controls, and anti-money laundering programs; national security trade and investment reviews; international arbitration and other cross-border disputes; international cybersecurity and data privacy; and issues of public international law. He has worked in various senior legal positions for the US government, giving him keen insight into domestic and international legal matters that influence US government national security and foreign relations policies and programs. Before joining Steptoe, Brian served as the Legal Adviser to the US Department of State, the Legal Adviser to the National Security Council, Deputy White House Counsel, and Assistant General Counsel for Enforcement and Intelligence with the US Department of the Treasury. Brian has regularly appeared in public fora to speak on international legal issues, including testifying before Congress, public speaking engagements, and panel presentations.

Read Brian’s full bio.

Email
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Corporate & Commercial, International
  • Blog:
    International Compliance Blog
  • Organization:
    Steptoe & Johnson LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog, Inc. logo
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers
99 Park Row
  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Products
  • Blog Pro
  • Blog Plus
  • Blog Premier
  • Microsite
  • Syndication Portals
  • LexBlog Community
  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center

New to the Network

  • The FTI Award Journal
  • International Dispute Resolution
  • China Law Update Blog
  • Law of The Ledger
  • Antitrust Law Blog
Copyright © 2022, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo