Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

The EMA has adopted new guidelines on good pharmacovigilance practices in paediatric populations

By Elisabethann Wright & Alexander Wenzel on November 26, 2018
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Introduction

The EMA Good Pharmacovigilance Practices consist of several chapters of the Notice to Applicants that are regularly updated. A new GVP Considerations Chapter (IV) regarding specific considerations for the paediatric population came into effect on 8 November 2018. The Considerations Chapter addressed pharmacovigilance issues that frequently arise with the paediatric population and related pharmacovigilance structures and processes. It provides guidance on how to make use of existing tools and processes specifically regarding the paediatric population.

The Considerations Chapter also covers the roles and responsibilities of the Marketing Authorisation Holders, applicants for marketing authorisation, and the EMA Paediatric Committee (PDCO) and the Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC).

The last part of the Considerations Chapter covers various EU plans such as the paediatric investigation plan and the risk management plan in the EU.

Specific paediatric pharmacovigilance issues

The paediatric population is the part of the population between birth and 18 years. Adverse reactions in the paediatric population may differ from adverse reactions occurring in the adult population. There can be differences in terms of frequency, nature, severity and presentation.

Medicinal products are often prescribed to minors in different patterns and the medicinal products are often used off-label.

The new Considerations Chapter IV provides that the five pharmacovigilance aspects specific to the paediatric population are: i) the paediatrics’ population susceptibility to adverse reactions, ii) the limited numbers of subjects in paediatric clinical trials iii) errors when providing medication to minors, iv) off-label use of adult medicinal products on minors and v) different signs and symptoms between paediatric patients compared to adults.

Structures and processes

GVP Module V and the Guidance on the format of the risk management plan (RMP) in the EU contain specific considerations for paediatric populations. The considerations identify and describe particularly important aspects for paediatric patients. Example given are “the effects on bone and cartilage during the paediatric growth phase” or “age related shifts in the interaction of the medicinal product with its target organs or tissues”.

The Considerations further describe the management and reporting of adverse reactions, the recording of the patient’s age information and other information that is relevant to the paediatric population. Other information relevant to the paediatric population include, as an example, the pharmaceutical form and strength of the active substance in the medicinal product.

The Considerations also provide guidance regarding Periodic Safety Update Reports (PSUR), Post-authorisation Safety Studies (PASS), safety communication and signal management.

Safety communication and accompanying risk minimisation measures (RMM) should include targeting specific audiences such as paediatricians and parents while involving the child as appropriate considering the child’s age.

 

Photo of Elisabethann Wright Elisabethann Wright
Read more about Elisabethann WrightEmail
Photo of Alexander Wenzel Alexander Wenzel
Read more about Alexander WenzelEmail
  • Posted in:
    Health Care and Life Sciences
  • Blog:
    Focus on Regulation
  • Organization:
    Hogan Lovells
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo