Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

New York Judge Finds $600M Opioid Surcharge Unconstitutional

By Doug Hallward-Driemeier on January 7, 2019
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

In December 2018,  the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York ruled that New York’s $600 million fee on the sale of opioids into the state unconstitutionally prohibits pharmaceutical companies from passing the cost onto consumers. Furthermore, the Court ruled that the Opioid Stewardship Act (OSA) violated U.S. Constitution’s dormant commerce clause and, therefore, was unconstitutional. The OSA would have forced manufacturers and distributors of opioid medications to pay pro rata shares of a $100 million annual penalty (using a volumetric calculation based on opioid strength, rather than price) while forbidding manufacturers and distributors from passing any portion of that annual cost to New York purchasers.

Please see this Law360 article to read more about the case.

Photo of Doug Hallward-Driemeier Doug Hallward-Driemeier
Read more about Doug Hallward-DriemeierEmail
  • Posted in:
    Administrative and Regulatory, Health Care and Life Sciences
  • Blog:
    Disputing Tax
  • Organization:
    Ropes & Gray
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo