Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Plaintiff Permitted to Amend Med Mal Complaint to Conform Pleadings to Additional Information Gathered During Discovery

By Daniel Cummins on January 14, 2019
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
stethoscope.jpg

In the case of Kellock v. Wilkes-Barre Hospital Co., LLC, No. 17-CV-4655 (C.P. Lacka. Co. Dec. 20, 2018 Nealon, J.), the court addressed issues pertaining to a request to amend a medical malpractice Complaint to conform to the evidence adduced during discovery.  
According to the Opinion, the Plaintiffs in this matter filed a medical malpractice Complaint against various Defendants involved with the birth and neonatal care of their child.  
Following the deposition of one of the Defendant doctors, the Plaintiff sought to amend their Complaint to add additional allegations of negligence against that particular Defendant doctor and one of the hospitals involved based upon the information gathered at the deposition.   The Plaintiffs asserted that they should be permitted to amend their pleading under Pa.R.C.P. 1033 and given that the statute of limitations had not expired relative to the claims brought on behalf of a minor Plaintiff.  
Applying the liberal standards pertaining to amendment of pleadings and noting that the Defendants had not established any prejudice in this context, the court allowed the requested amendments.   The court also noted that the proposed amendments served to merely amplify the Plaintiff’s already existing allegations.   Based, in part, on these factors, the Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend was granted.   

Anyone wishing to review this decision by Judge Nealon in the Kellock case may click this LINK.

Photo of Daniel Cummins Daniel Cummins

Daniel E. Cummins is a civil litigator and Partner in the Clarks Summit, Pennsylvania law firm of Cummins Law, which is located in northeastern Pennsylvania, just outside of Scranton. He has served as a columnist for the Pennsylvania Law Weekly and appeared in…

Daniel E. Cummins is a civil litigator and Partner in the Clarks Summit, Pennsylvania law firm of Cummins Law, which is located in northeastern Pennsylvania, just outside of Scranton. He has served as a columnist for the Pennsylvania Law Weekly and appeared in the Best Lawyers in America Director every year since 2015. He is the creator and sole author of Tort Talk, a blog dedicated to discussing updates, trends, and thoughts regarding Civil Litigation Law.

Read more about Daniel CumminsEmailDaniel's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Health Care and Life Sciences
  • Blog:
    Tort Talk
  • Organization:
    Foley, Comerford & Cummins
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo