Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

TRICARE: Defense Health Agency Issues Request for Information Regarding Formulary Management – Submission Deadline: February 5, 2019

By Keeley A. McCarty on January 30, 2019
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

The Defense Health Agency (DHA), which manages the TRICARE health care benefits, has issued a Request for Information (RFI) regarding inpatient-clinic administered pharmaceuticals formulary management. In other words, responding vendors have the opportunity to shape the standard list of drugs prescribed across all military medical treatment facilities (MTFs), as well as the broader program administering the list. Responses are due February 5, 2019. The RFI seeks commercial best practices in formulary management focusing on inpatient and medical benefit drugs, but also opens the door for responding vendors to describe their capabilities to train a formulary management staff, to develop approaches to formulary management, to compare program results, to maximize acceptance of an implemented program, and to utilize pharmacists in an inpatient setting.

DHA issued this RFI as part of a larger effort to integrate the Military Health System under its sole administration, in response to Section 702 of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) of 2017, as amended by Section 711 of the 2019 NDAA, which dictates that DHA will assume responsibility for administration of all MTFs by September 30, 2021. The DHA set forth its current phased plan for the transition in its 2018 Final Report to Congress, available here. DHA’s administration responsibilities will include any drug formulary for inpatient services provided through TRICARE at MTFs. DHA’s pharmacy operations currently cover only outpatient prescribed drugs, hence the agency’s interest in commercial best practices for inpatient settings.

Although DHA’s primary interest is in solutions to MTF settings, DHA is also interested in solutions that may apply to “Purchased Care” settings by network and non-network providers.

Instructions for responding to the RFI, as well as the RFI in full, are available here. While declining to respond to this RFI does not preclude vendors from participating in a future Request for Proposals, providing input could be advantageous to vendors that want to help shape the formulary program on which they may ultimately propose and perform.

 

Photo of Keeley A. McCarty Keeley A. McCarty

Keeley McCarty is an associate in the Governmental Practice in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office.

Read more about Keeley A. McCartyEmail
  • Posted in:
    Health Care and Life Sciences
  • Blog:
    Government Contracts & Investigations Blog
  • Organization:
    Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo