Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Ordinance Restricting Railways Use of a Storage Facility Permanently Enjoined

By Anthony B. Cavender on March 21, 2019
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On March 7, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit decided the case of Vermont Railway, Inc. v. Town of Shelburne. The U.S. District Court for the District of Vermont granted the railway a permanent injunction against an ordinance passed by the Town of Shelburne, VT, that placed severe restrictions on the railway’s use of a storage facility to be used for the stockpiling and storage of large quantities of rock salt to be used in the railroad’s winter de-icing operations.

Both the District Court and the Second Circuit held that this ordinance, which affected the operations of the railroad, was preempted by the Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act, 49 U.S.C.  §§ 10101, et seq., and was not, on this record, a valid exercise of the Town’s police powers. Indeed, the District Court held that the ordinance was discriminatory and did not achieve any meaningful health or safety goals.

  • Posted in:
    Administrative and Regulatory
  • Blog:
    Gravel2Gavel
  • Organization:
    Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo