Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

New FinCEN Cryptocurrency Guidance Clarifies Applicability of Anti-Money Laundering Regulations to Virtual Currency Business Models

By Norman Roos on May 23, 2019
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) is the U.S. Treasury Department bureau charged with monitoring financial transactions in order to combat domestic and international money laundering, terrorist financing, and other financial crimes.

Under FinCEN’s Bank Secrecy Act/Anti-Money Laundering regulations, money transmitters and other money service businesses are required to develop anti-money laundering/countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) policies, including know your customer and suspicious activity reporting (SAR) procedures.

The advent of blockchain and the ensuing crypto currency business boom have posed significant challenges for FinCEN and other financial service regulators. See FinCen Advisory.

In order to help address those challenges, FinCen issued Guidance (FIN-2019-G001) on May 9 regarding the Application of FinCEN’s Regulations to Certain Business Models Involving Convertible Virtual Currencies (CVC). The Guidance is intended to “remind persons subject to the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) how FinCEN regulations relating to money services businesses (MSBs) apply to certain business models involving money transmission denominated in value that substitutes for currency, specifically, convertible virtual currencies.”

While the Guidance does not purport to establish any new regulatory requirements, it consolidates current FinCEN regulations, rulings and guidance and gives specific examples as to how the current FinCEN requirements apply to certain current and emerging virtual currency business models.

The Guidance first confirms that money transmission involving virtual currencies, including CVC, are subject to the AML program, recordkeeping, monitoring and reporting requirements ) applicable to money transmitters generally,including SARs and Currency Transaction Reports.

The Guidance then goes on to set forth specific examples of how the BSA regulations apply to common business models involving the transmission of CVC, including: [1]peer-to-peer exchangers; [2] hosted, unhosted and multiple-signature CVC wallet providers; [3] CVC kiosks; [4] DApps ( money transmission services provided through decentralized applications); [5] anonymity-enhanced CVC transactions; [6] CVC payment processors; and [7] internet casinos.

The Guidance concludes with a description of specific business models involving CVC transactions that may qualify for exemption from the definition of money transmission. These business models include CVC trading platforms, Initial Coin Offerings, CVC creators, mining pools and cloud miners.

Photo of Norman Roos Norman Roos

Norman Roos, a member of Robinson+Cole’s Business Transactions Group, concentrates his practice on transactional, regulatory, and technology matters relating to the financial services and real estate industries. He is also a member of the firm’s Financial Services Cyber-Compliance Team and advises financial institutions…

Norman Roos, a member of Robinson+Cole’s Business Transactions Group, concentrates his practice on transactional, regulatory, and technology matters relating to the financial services and real estate industries. He is also a member of the firm’s Financial Services Cyber-Compliance Team and advises financial institutions concerning data privacy and security matters, particularly in relation to policy planning and implementation.

Mr. Roos is counsel to the Connecticut Mortgage Bankers Association, Inc., and is president-elect of the American College of Mortgage Attorneys where he has served on the Board of Regents and as Connecticut State Chair. A member of the Connecticut Bar Association, Mr. Roos is Past Chair of the Financial Institutions Law Section. He has served on a number of Connecticut Law Revision Study Committees including those on Uniform Common Interest Ownership Act, Electronic Communications, Mortgagor Liability, and Electronic Recording of Land Records. Read his full bio here.

Read more about Norman RoosEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Banking, Finance and Securities
  • Blog:
    Data Privacy + Cybersecurity Insider
  • Organization:
    Robinson & Cole LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo