Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Swiss-EU stalemate prolongs share trading uncertainty

By Beth Duff (BE) on June 13, 2019
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Dialogue on the EU-Switzerland Framework Agreement recommenced on Friday 07 June with a letter from the Swiss Federal Council to European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker . This is the first public correspondence since negotiations reached a stalemate in December 2018. Negotiations on an inter-institutional agreement, which would usually be of little importance to equity markets, are now being watched closely as the European Commission has linked the conclusion of the agreement with the continuation of the temporary decision on the equivalence of Swiss trading venues for the purposes of the Article 23 MiFIR share trading obligation (STO). The most recent equivalence decision is set to expire on 30 June 2019.

Over the last six months the Swiss Federal Council has conducted a stakeholder consultation to inform its negotiating position, in line with its system of direct democracy. On the basis of the responses, the Federal Council has written to the Commission requesting clarifications on three matters relating to state aid, freedom of movement and wage protections. Moreover, the Federal Council requested a further temporary extension of the STO equivalence pending resolution on these three matters. President Juncker was quick to respond with a letter acknowledging these points and setting a deadline of 18 June for agreement to be reached – the date of the next meeting of the College of Commissioners. Most notably Juncker made no reference to the STO equivalence decision. This may be considered as a sign that the Commission is willing to depoliticise the agreement, but it is more likely that the Commission is simply not showing its hand so as to maintain the pressure on the Swiss.

The negotiations have now recommenced in Brussels. Whilst the 18 June deadline for agreement is highly ambitious and possibly unrealistic, it may serve as the date on which the Commission will take stock of progress and make a final decision on whether to prolong the equivalence decision permanently, temporarily or not at all. The Commission’s use of the Swiss trading equivalence as a political pawn has been highly criticised by industry and politicians. The EU equivalence framework is likely to be reviewed by the incoming Commission and the politicisation of, what are supposed to be objective, equivalence decisions will most definitely be subject to scrutiny.

Photo of Beth Duff (BE) Beth Duff (BE)
Read more about Beth Duff (BE)Email
  • Posted in:
    Banking, Finance and Securities
  • Blog:
    Global Regulation Tomorrow
  • Organization:
    Norton Rose Fulbright
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo