Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

AFM points out licence obligation for proprietary trading firms that execute orders on behalf of clients

By Floortje Nagelkerke (NL) & Anka Langedijk (NL) on August 29, 2019
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On 28 August 2019, the Netherlands Authority for the Financial Markets (Autoriteit Financiële Markten AFM) published a news item addressing the licence obligation for proprietary trading firms (handelaren voor eigen rekening), in particular in case orders are executed on behalf of clients.

The AFM indicates in order to determine whether someone is dealing on own account it is important to establish whose accounts are used for transactions and who is legally bound by the transactions.

An investment firm executing orders on behalf of clients could under circumstances also be considered to be dealing on own account. This is the case if an investment firm executes orders on behalf of clients on a trading venue using its own membership and subsequently direct these to the clients’ on a matched principal-basis (back-to-back trading).

View AFM’s press release (Dutch only), 28 August 2019.

 

Photo of Floortje Nagelkerke (NL) Floortje Nagelkerke (NL)
Read more about Floortje Nagelkerke (NL)Email
  • Posted in:
    Banking, Finance and Securities
  • Blog:
    Global Regulation Tomorrow
  • Organization:
    Norton Rose Fulbright
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo