Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Bipartisan Push To Repeal ACA’s Cadillac Tax

By Jordan Grushkin, Matthew Goldman & Samuel O'Brien on September 25, 2019
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

One of the most controversial taxes of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) is in danger of repeal. The tax colloquially known as the “Cadillac Tax” was supposed to take effect in 2018, but Congress has delayed it twice. With the tax now slated to take effect in 2022, opponents of the tax have taken the opportunity to attempt to repeal it for good. On July 17, 2019, the House of Representatives overwhelming voted, 419-6, to approve the Middle Class Health Benefits Tax Repeal Act of 2019, which would abolish the Cadillac Tax. A Senate companion bill with 61 co-sponsors, including 32 Republicans and 28 Democrats, shows that the bill is unlikely to encounter much resistance if it is brought to a vote.

The aptly named Cadillac Tax is a 40% excise tax on the most expensive and comprehensive employer health insurance plans, specifically those plans that cost more than $11,200 for an individual policy or $30,150 for family coverage. The 40% tax only affects the amount of the plan that is over the threshold, and it is not tax deductible. This tax attempts to prevent employers from offering health plans with minimal or no deductibles or out-of-pocket expenses. The rationale behind the tax was to prevent individuals without any financial stake in their healthcare costs from spending aimlessly and excessively on tests and procedures. While intuitively it would seem like the wealthiest individuals would be the most likely to be penalized by this tax, organized labor has been among the tax’s most bitter opposition. Organized labor has argued that instead of preparing to pay this tax, employers have cut health benefits that the unions fought so hard to obtain. In order to stay under the Cadillac Tax threshold, employers have increased premiums, deductibles and other cost sharing mechanisms.

Despite its bipartisan appeal, there is still opposition to the repeal of the Cadillac Tax. A letter to the Senate on July 29 from economists and other health experts argued that the tax “will help curtail the growth of private health insurance premiums by encouraging employers to limit the costs of plans to the tax-free amount.” The letter also pointed out that repealing the tax “would add directly to the federal budget deficit, an estimated $197 billion over the next decade, according to the Joint Committee on Taxation.”

Key Takeaway

Given the popularity of the repeal of the Cadillac Tax on both sides of the political aisle, the tax’s future appears to be in serious jeopardy. Whether the present legislative effort will succeed, however, is an open question and will be something to watch for in the coming weeks and months.

Photo of Jordan Grushkin Jordan Grushkin

Jordan Grushkin is a partner in the Corporate Practice Group in the firm’s Century City office and is a member of the firm’s healthcare practice team.

Read more about Jordan GrushkinEmail
Photo of Matthew Goldman Matthew Goldman

Matthew Goldman is a partner in the Corporate Practice Group in the firm’s Century City office and is a member of the firm’s healthcare practice team.

Read more about Matthew GoldmanEmail
Photo of Samuel O'Brien Samuel O'Brien

Samuel O’Brien is an associate in the Corporate Practice Group in the firm’s Century City office and is a member of the firm’s Healthcare team.

Read more about Samuel O'BrienEmail
  • Posted in:
    Health Care and Life Sciences
  • Blog:
    Healthcare Law Blog
  • Organization:
    Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo