Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

USDA Publishes Long-Awaited Interim Regulations Governing the Production of Legalized Hemp

By Alva C. Mather on November 1, 2019
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Yesterday, the United Stated Department of Agriculture (USDA) released its interim final rule setting forth the proposed rules and regulations regarding the production of hemp under the provisions of the Agricultural Improvement Act of 2018, or the “2018 Farm Bill.” As mandated by the 2018 Farm Bill, the proposed regulations outline provisions for both the approval by the USDA of State or Indian Tribe proposed plans as well as the development of its own federal plan for the production of hemp in the absence of an applicable approved State or Tribal program.

While the draft rule is still subject to further comment, it provides the first official guidance from the USDA regarding the lawful production of hemp under the 2018 Farm Bill. In general, each of the approved State, Indian Tribe or Federal Plans include requirements for documenting and reporting, such as:

  • Land descriptions, including geospatial location identifiers and total crop acreage
  • Sampling and testing hemp as close to harvest as possible to ensure the truest measurement of THC levels, which have to be at or below 0.3%
  • Development of an “acceptable hemp THC level” to account for margins of error when testing for THC levels in a proposed hemp product
  • Use of DEA-certified or registered companies for the testing and disposal of these products given the potential, if over 0.3% THC, to be handling “marijuana,” which remains a controlled substance under federal law
  • Compliance procedures, including random sampling of producers, as well as plans for corrective action if the product contains more than 0.3% THC based on the determined culpable mental state of the producer
  • Company and ownership reporting, including both direct and indirect ownership in the hemp producer, as well as criminal histories

In addition, the USDA specifically requested further public comment on the following areas of regulatory oversight:

  1. Factors to consider in determining that the production of hemp above the 0.3% THC threshold was legally negligent and therefore protected from otherwise criminal prosecution;
  2. The impact of the proposed rule on the marketplace and innovative efforts surrounding hemp production; and
  3. Other resources for identifying “small producers.”

Finally, while the interim rule provides much anticipated guidance regarding the production of hemp products, it is also worth noting what the rule does not cover. Namely, regulatory guidance on the distribution, marketing and retail sale of hemp or hemp-based CBD products, which will come either from the FDA or individual state legislative efforts.

Photo of Alva C. Mather Alva C. Mather

Alva C. Mather focuses her practice on alcohol beverage and cannabis regulatory and commercial matters. She represents companies in the alcohol beverage industry, including brewers, distillers, wineries, importers and retailers. Additionally, she works with clients in the growing cannabis space and has in-depth…

Alva C. Mather focuses her practice on alcohol beverage and cannabis regulatory and commercial matters. She represents companies in the alcohol beverage industry, including brewers, distillers, wineries, importers and retailers. Additionally, she works with clients in the growing cannabis space and has in-depth knowledge of the evolving legal and regulatory issues facing this industry. Read Alva Mather’s full bio.

Read more about Alva C. MatherEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Food, Drug & Agriculture
  • Blog:
    Alcohol Law Advisor
  • Organization:
    McDermott Will & Emery
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo