Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

The Regulation of Fusion – A Practical and Innovation-Friendly Approach

By Amy Roma & Sachin Desai on February 14, 2020
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

We have prepared an in-depth white paper, issued today, addressing the regulation of fusion in the United States:  “The Regulation of Fusion – A Practical and Innovation-Friendly Approach.”  Fusion, the process that powers the Sun, has long been seen as the “holy grail” of energy production.  The U.S. is now in a nuclear innovation renaissance, building upon substantial R&D investments and technology advancements over the last seventy years. Now, more than at any point in history, break-even fusion energy production seems achievable within a decade, with commercial-scale fusion generation available sometime within the next decade or two.  We have therefore reached a critical juncture, as we now must ask: how is fusion—and how should it be—regulated?

This paper addresses in detail the issue of fusion regulation.  We examine key questions pertaining to the regulation of fusion, such as who is responsible for regulating it and how should they regulate.  In particular, while the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has maintained it has regulatory jurisdiction over fusion, a key  question is how its jurisdiction should be applied.  The NRC manages many frameworks under which a wide variety of radioactive materials are regulated, and the regulatory category that fusion facilities ultimately find themselves in will greatly affect their overall regulatory burden.

We propose near- and long-term recommendations as to the regulatory path forward for fusion.  These recommendations recognize the effectiveness of current regulations to provide for public health and safety during fusion development and demonstration.  To the extent a future regulatory framework is needed at commercial scale, such a framework should consider that the radiological concerns involved with fusion differ significantly from those with fission.  It may seem attractive to lump fusion in the same category as fission—but that would be a mistake with far-reaching consequences for fusion innovation, U.S. technological leadership, and the planet.

For additional information, please contact the authors.

  • Posted in:
    Energy and Utilities
  • Blog:
    New Nuclear
  • Organization:
    Hogan Lovells
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo