Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Customs Ruling of the Week – Classification of Keurig coffee brewer

By Frances P. Hadfield & Rebecca Toro Condori on February 21, 2020
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

In ruling NY N308736, Customs and Border Protection (CBP) determined the country of origin of a Keurig Model K90 single serve coffee brewer. This coffee brewer measures approximately 13 inches tall, by 10 inches wide, and 13 inches deep. It includes features such as choice of cup size, auto-off functionality, and a removable drip tray.

The coffee brewer will be exported to the United States from Indonesia. The manufacturing and assembling of various subassemblies would be undertaken in Malaysia and Indonesia, with final assembly in Indonesia. The brewer consists of two principal components, the hot water tank and the brewer base, and three supporting subassemblies, the cold water tank, the user interface, and the puncture mechanism. In addition, it consists of various tubes for the conveyance of water between the subassemblies, connecting electrical wires, and a power cord.

The hot water tank and brewer base assembly would be manufactured and assembled in Malaysia and would then be sent to Indonesia and incorporated with the other subassemblies into the completed brewer. The hot water heater subassembly would use parts sourced from Malaysia, China, and a third country, with the bulk coming from China. The brewer base subassembly would be assembled from parts sourced from Malaysia, Vietnam, and China.

CBP determined that the hot water tank subassembly is what provides the essential character to this product and allows it to be classified under heading 8516. As the parts of various origin are substantially transformed into the completed hot water tank and brewer base subassemblies, these components would be Malaysian in origin. The additional steps completed in Indonesia, described as “screw driver operations,” are considered by CBP to be simple assembly and does not substantially change the nature of this product. Therefore, CBP determined that the Model K90 single serve coffee brewer would be a product of Malaysia.

 

Photo of Frances P. Hadfield Frances P. Hadfield

Frances P. Hadfield is a counsel in Crowell & Moring’s International Trade Group in the firm’s New York office. Her practice focuses on forced labor and withhold release orders (WRO), import regulatory compliance, and customs litigation. She regularly advises corporations on matters involving…

Frances P. Hadfield is a counsel in Crowell & Moring’s International Trade Group in the firm’s New York office. Her practice focuses on forced labor and withhold release orders (WRO), import regulatory compliance, and customs litigation. She regularly advises corporations on matters involving customs compliance, audits, customs enforcement, as well as import penalties.

Frances represents clients before the U.S. Court of International Trade and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, as well as in proceedings at the administrative level. She advises corporations on both substantive federal and state regulatory issues that involve U.S. Customs and Border Protection, the Federal Trade Commission, Food and Drug Administration, and U.S. Fish & Wildlife in matters pertaining to product admissibility, audits, classification, import restrictions, investigations, marking, licenses, origin, penalties, and tariff preference programs.

Read more about Frances P. HadfieldEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Rebecca Toro Condori Rebecca Toro Condori
Read more about Rebecca Toro CondoriEmail
  • Posted in:
    Business and Commercial
  • Blog:
    International Trade Law
  • Organization:
    Crowell & Moring LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo