Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Washington Privacy Act Update: WPA Moves to Conference Committee

By David Stauss [Former Attorney] & Erik Dullea on March 10, 2020
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Keypoint: With just two days to go before the close of the Washington legislature, a conference committee will try to resolve conflicts between the House and Senate versions of the WPA.

As we previously reported, on Friday, March 6, the Washington House passed an amended version of the Washington Privacy Act (WPA) that included a private right of action. The bill then moved back to the Senate where, on Monday, March 9, the Senate refused to concur in the amendments and asked the House to recede from them. Predictably, the House refused.

However, the House requested that the Senate agree to a conference committee, which request the Senate quickly granted. The House and Senate thereafter appointed three members each to participate in the conference committee.

The Senate appointed Senators Carlyle, Dhingra, and Rivers – all of whom sponsored the Senate version of the WPA and voted in its favor. Senator Carlyle has been the Senate bill’s lead advocate.

The House appointed Representatives Hudgins, Hansen, and Dufault. Representative Hudgins sits as chair of the House Committee on Innovation, Technology & Economic Development, which is the committee that amended the WPA to include a private right of action. Representatives Hudgins and Hansen voted in favor of the amended House version while Representative Dufault voted against it.

For the conference committee to be successful, it will need to find compromise positions on the two biggest differences between the House and Senate versions of the WPA – enforcement and facial recognition. It will need to find those compromise positions quickly as the legislative session closes Thursday, March 12.

If a compromise is reached, both chambers would have to adopt the conference committee report for the WPA to pass and head to the Governor. Interested readers should click here to stay up-to-date on all of the developments.

Photo of David Stauss [Former Attorney] David Stauss [Former Attorney]

Formerly with Husch Blackwell, David routinely counseled clients on complying with privacy laws such as the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation, the California Consumer Privacy Act, the Colorado Privacy Act, and other state privacy laws.

Email
Photo of Erik Dullea Erik Dullea

As head of Husch Blackwell’s Cybersecurity practice group, Erik assists clients in all aspects of cybersecurity and information security compliance and data breach response. Erik previously served as the acting deputy associate general counsel for the National Security Agency’s cybersecurity practice group before…

As head of Husch Blackwell’s Cybersecurity practice group, Erik assists clients in all aspects of cybersecurity and information security compliance and data breach response. Erik previously served as the acting deputy associate general counsel for the National Security Agency’s cybersecurity practice group before returning to the firm in 2023.

Read more about Erik DulleaEmailErik's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Privacy and Cybersecurity
  • Blog:
    Byte Back
  • Organization:
    Husch Blackwell LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo