Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

DOJ Antitrust Division Approves COVID-related Competitor Collaboration Under Expedited Procedures

By James M. Burns on April 7, 2020
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

The Department of Justice Antitrust Division (the “Antitrust Division”) has granted its approval to a plan by a group of medical supply manufacturers to collaborate in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. In a business review letter issued on April 4, the Antitrust Division stated that McKesson Corp., Cardinal Health, Owens & Minor, Medline Industries and Henry Schein Inc. could work together to speed up the manufacture and distribution of COVID-19 supplies. The business review is the Antitrust Division’s first since announcing a new procedure in March to provide expedited guidance on COVID-19 related requests.

The parties’ request was submitted on March 30th and described their plan for coordination.  Their collaboration would increase their production of personal protective equipment (PPE) and would ensure delivery on an expedited basis of PPE to the parts of the country with the greatest need. Indicating that the parties’ activities are being taken in response to calls to action by FEMA, HHS and the White House, the Antitrust Division noted that the parties’ conduct was consistent with the antitrust laws, which typically permit action that is (1) compelled by an agreement with a federal agency or a clearly defined federal government policy and (2) subject to supervision by a federal agency. In addition, the Antitrust Division noted that even if the proposal did not fully satisfy the above-described standard, the conduct was nevertheless likely to offer unique benefits justifying its approval, and specifically noted that the parties’ activities would be undertaken under the supervision of FEMA.

Finally, in approving the request, the Antitrust Division noted that the proposed coordination would be “limited in scope and duration,” was “necessary to address COVID-19 related scarcity,” and that it “will not extend beyond what is required to facilitate the availability of needed supplies.” In addition, the Antitrust Division noted that the requesting parties were “not using the collaboration to increase prices, reduce output, reduce quality or otherwise engage in COVID-19 profiteering.”

A copy of the Antitrust Division’s approval letter can be found here.

  • Posted in:
    Antitrust, Competition and Trade
  • Blog:
    Health Law Rx
  • Organization:
    Akerman LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo