Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

Know Your Audience

By Katherine Gallo on April 7, 2020
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Recently at an MCLE seminar, a sitting judge forewarned the audience that because of all the new judges coming from a variety of backgrounds, often they don’t  have the necessary background on law and procedures for their department. His advice:

come to your hearings with copies of all the important cases and statutes, no matter how basic the concept is.

This sitting judge was subtly saying: Plan on educating the court!!

Before you file your motion, do your research on the Judge

What is the judge’s reputation? Check with members of your firm as well as members of the legal community as to their experiences with the Judge.

Are there any appellate decisions that review the Judge’s previous rulings?  In what area(s) of law  was reviewed, upheld or overruled?

Find out the Judge’s background prior to taking the bench. Did they practice in state court or federal court?  What type of practice did they have –criminal, civil, family, probate, etc.  Has this Judge had enough exposure to civil litigation to understand that the philosophy of discovery is a liberal exchange of information as well as its limitations set forth in the Code of Civil Procedure and current case law?

Watch the tentative rulings weeks prior to your hearing. It may provide insight on how the Judge handles discovery motions and sanctions.

Determine whether you want to file a challenge to the judge pursuant to C.C.P. section 170.6. Remember that “if the judge, other than a judge assigned to the case for all purposes, court commissioner, or referee assigned to, or who is scheduled to try, the cause or hear the matter is known at least 10 days before the date set for trial or hearing, the motion shall be made at least 5 days before that date.” C.C.P. section 170.6(a)(2)

Determine whether you want to request a discovery referee to be appointed pursuant to C.C.P. section 638 or C.C.P. section 639(a)(5)

When you receive the tentative ruling

Don’t assume that your papers were read in depth and the court understands the nuances of why you need the discovery you are requesting. Discovery motions can be voluminous and the courts don’t really have the time to do a deep dive on your papers.

Make copies of relevant case law and statutes to give to the court and opposing counsel. Highlight the relevant portions.

Make copies of relevant discussions from CEB’s California Civil Discovery Practice, the Rutter Group’s California Practice Guide: Civil Procedure Before Trial or other relevant treatise discussions to give to the court and opposing counsel. Again, highlight the relevant portions.

Hire a court reporter to report the hearing. Then you will have the transcript for evidence for future discovery hearings if necessary as well as for a writ or appeal.

Be prepared to educate the court (1) the specific facts of the case, (2) why the Discovery is needed to prosecute or defend your client, (3) why you are entitled to a code compliant response, (4) why you are entitled to a detailed privilege log, and (5) why the documents requested should be produced.

The Judge has a past: learn it. You may need to show the Judge not just what the law is, but why it is and will be grateful if you help them out.

 

 

 

Katherine Gallo

Katherine Gallo is an expert in complex discovery issues and is actively involved in Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) as a Discovery Referee, Mediator and Arbitrator in Northern California since 1994. Ms. Gallo is known for her extensive discovery seminars, in house discovery training…

Katherine Gallo is an expert in complex discovery issues and is actively involved in Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) as a Discovery Referee, Mediator and Arbitrator in Northern California since 1994. Ms. Gallo is known for her extensive discovery seminars, in house discovery training, and go-to blog on pre-trial discovery. Since 2010, she has authored a on discovery titled www.resolvingdiscoverydisputes.com.

Ms. Gallo has served as a court appointed or party selected private Discovery Referee or Special Master in over 250 hotly litigated matters concerning complex issues in business, construction defect (including lines and construction operations losses), insurance, employment (including wrongful termination, discrimination, harassment, and wage and hour claims), elder abuse, real property (including eminent domain, easements, and commissions), Lemon Law, personal injury and family law, many with multiple party litigants, including class actions. Well known to the judiciary, her court appointments in complex matters have come from the Superior Courts throughout the State.

Ms. Gallo has mediated or acted as a pro tem settlement judge in over 500 matters with a 90% settlement rate. Ms. Gallo takes pride in accomplishing the parties’ and the courts’ objectives with regard to impartiality, timeliness and accuracy.

Read more about Katherine GalloEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Other
  • Blog:
    Resolving Discovery Disputes
  • Organization:
    Katherine Gallo, Esq.
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo