Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Proposed Anti-Spying Legislation May Not Be Cause for Alarm for Gamers in Congress

By Ethan Aronson on May 6, 2020
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Social-Media-and-Games-Blog-Image_AI_660x283

On Thursday April 30, 2020 U.S. Senators Ted Cruz and Josh Hawley announced their intent to introduce the ” Countering Chinese Attempts at Snooping ” Act,  with the goal of “… Banning U.S. Officials from Using Tencent, … [and] Other Chinese Communist Party-Backed Platforms.” Specifically, the legislation requires that the company that creates the prohibited technology be “domiciled in the People’s Republic of China or subject to influence or control by the Government of the People Republic of China or the Communist Party of the People’s Republic of China” (“China”).  Given Tencent’s investments and involvement in some of the most popular game companies, this may come as a concern to the gamers in congress. But there are two reasons why this legislation may not cut into their gaming sessions.

The first reason is that this legislation is unlikely to implicate the use of the most popular games produced by Tencent related entities which are domiciled outside of China. Assuming these entities are not subject to the influence of or controlled by China, it is possible that such entities are not covered by the legislation.

The second reason is that the legislation only prohibits “conduct[ing] official business” on these platforms. While gaming may be more important now than ever, many games, played just for recreation, are unlikely to be covered conduct under the legislation. However, it is possible that so-called “serious games” which use games for government training, simulations and other government purposes possibly could have official government business occurring on these platforms.

Although the exact list of technologies covered by the proposed legislation has not been determined, and it’s not clear that the legislation will even be voted into law, it’s unlikely that this legislation will significantly impact congresspeople’s ability to play their favorite games in their down time.

Photo of Ethan Aronson Ethan Aronson

Ethan R. Aronson is an associate in the Corporate Practice Group in the firm’s New York office.

Read more about Ethan AronsonEmail
  • Posted in:
    Sports and Gaming
  • Blog:
    Game Counsel
  • Organization:
    Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo