Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

House and Senate Democrats Introduce Public Health Emergency Privacy Act

By Brandon Robinson on May 14, 2020
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Today, Senators Blumenthal (D-CT) and Mark Warner (D-VA) introduced the Public Health Emergency Privacy Act (“PHEPA”) into the Senate. A companion house bill was introduced by Reps. Anna Eshoo (D-CA), Jan Schakowsky (D-IL), and Suzan DelBene (D-WA), which was co-sponsored by Reps. Yvette Clarke (D-NY), G.K. Butterfield (D-NY), and Tony Cárdenas (D-CA).   This and similar legislation has been introduced in the last week as health agencies and technology companies nationwide are developing contact tracing and monitoring tools to contain the pandemic.

The Act would restrict data collected for public health purposes, limit what and by whom it can be collected and for what purposes it can be used. For example:

  • It requires data minimization procedures for that info, and require opt-in consent for any efforts.
  • It would formally mandate data collected to fight the pandemic be deleted after the public health emergency.
  • The bill would protect personal data collected in connection with COVID-19 from being used for non-public health purposes,
  • It would prohibit conditioning the right to vote based on use of such services or a medical condition.
  • It provides for both public enforcement (by the FTC) as well as a private right of action.
  • The private right of action specifies a range of statutory penalties ($100-$1000 for negligent violations, $500-$500 for reckless, willful, or intentional violations), plus attorney fees and costs, and any other appropriate relief. It would also make the statutory violation sufficient injury to allege standing.

This Democratic legislation comes as a counterproposal to the Senate Republicans’ bill, the COVID-19 Consumer Data Protection Act, failed to gain Democratic support.  The Republican bill’s opt-in requirement was more limited to data collected for purposes of tracking the spread of the virus, and did not include the same civil rights protections that are included in this legislation. It also did not include a private right of action. Both bills, however, include rules mandating transparency and consent, and controlling the use of data for purposes other than public health.

An unofficial copy of the legislation is available here on the website of the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC).  We will update this post once it is available in the Congressional Record.

Photo of Brandon Robinson Brandon Robinson

Brandon Robinson is a partner at Balch & Bingham. He counsels clients in a wide variety of industries regarding cybersecurity and data privacy issues to assist them in proactively managing risks while maintaining innovative customer service.

Read more about Brandon RobinsonEmailBrandon's Linkedin ProfileBrandon's Twitter Profile
  • Posted in:
    Privacy and Cybersecurity
  • Blog:
    Data Privacy & Security Observer
  • Organization:
    Balch & Bingham LLP

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo