Skip to content

Menu

ChannelsPublishersSubscribe
LexBlog, Inc. logo
LexBlog, Inc. logo
ProductsSub-MenuBlogsPortalsTwentySyndicationMicrositesResource Center
Join
Search
Close
Join the Movement. Blog 4 Good

CARES Act Provider Relief Fund: Connecting HHS’s Dots on Whether Your Tranche #1 Payment Is An Overpayment

By Meg S.L. Pekarske & Andrew Brenton on June 10, 2020
EmailTweetLikeLinkedIn

After the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) automatically distributed $30 billion to providers as Tranche #1 Relief Fund payments based on 2019 Medicare fee-for-service payment data, HHS subsequently released a new formula that was based on 2018 “program service revenue” and intended to calculate providers’ payments under Relief Fund Tranches #1 and #2 cumulatively.  For providers whose Tranche #1 payments alone exceeded their expected payment under the new “program service revenue” formula, there have been ongoing questions about whether such providers were “overpaid” and needed to reject and return their Tranche #1 payments.

While guidance in this area has evolved frequently,[1] there is support that HHS does not consider a Tranche #1 payment that merely exceeds a provider’s expected payment under HHS’s “program service revenue” formula to be an overpayment.  The below chart contains examples of HHS guidance and actions that lend support to this position.  It is important to note that payments that were received in error or that exceed a provider’s qualifying expenses and losses will need to be returned.[2]  While HHS says that unused payment amounts should be returned “at the conclusion of the pandemic,”[3] HHS has not otherwise defined the end date for qualifying expenses and losses or the process for returning unused payment amounts.

HHS Removed “Do Not Attest” Language.

HHS removed language from the Provider Relief Fund payment attestation portal that had instructed providers not to attest if their Tranche #1 payment exceeded their expected payment under the “program service revenue” formula.

 

HHS Characterizes the “Program Service Revenue” Formula As Calculating a Provider’s Minimum Payment Amount.

·      HHS updated its communications to providers and its Relief Fund FAQs[4] to characterize the “program service revenue” formula as calculating the minimum amount of payment a provider can expect to receive under Tranches #1 and #2 cumulatively, as opposed to a maximum amount or “cap.”

·      In its Relief Fund FAQs, HHS says that “[p]roviders do not need to be able to prove, at the time they accept a Provider Relief Fund payment, that prior and/or future lost revenues and increased expenses attributable to COVID-19 (excluding those covered by other sources of reimbursement) meet or exceed their Provider Relief Fund payment.”[5]

 

HHS Appears to Be Focusing Future Enforcement on Proper Use of Relief Payments.

In its Relief Fund FAQs, HHS says:

·      “Generally, HHS does not intend to recoup funds as long as a provider’s lost revenue and increased expenses exceed the amount of Provider Relief funding a provider has received.”[6]

·      “HHS expects that providers will only use Provider Relief Fund payments for permissible purposes and if, at the conclusion of the pandemic, providers have leftover Provider Relief Fund money that they cannot expend on permissible expenses or losses, then they will return this money to HHS.  HHS will provide directions in the future about how to return unused funds.”[7]

·      “Retention and use of these funds are subject to certain terms and conditions.  If these terms and conditions are met, payments do not need to be repaid at a later date.”[8]  The referenced Terms and Conditions do not require rejection of Tranche #1 payments based on application of the “program service revenue” formula.

Because the evaluation of Relief Funds is fact-specific and relies on constantly evolving HHS guidance, providers should consult their Husch Blackwell attorney who can advise on particular risks and considerations.

[1] Note that HHS has updated its Relief Fund FAQs repeatedly, sometimes on a near-daily basis.  This article is based on the version of the FAQs that appeared on HHS’s website as of June 9, 2020.  It is likely that HHS will continue to update its FAQs subsequent to the publication of this article.

[2] “HHS reserves the right to audit Relief Fund recipients in the future to . . . collect any Relief Fund amounts that were made in error or exceed lost revenue or increased expenses due to COVID-19.”  See HHS, Relief Fund FAQs at 10 (last accessed June 9, 2020).  Note that HHS has not further defined what receiving a relief payment “in error” means.

[3] See HHS, Relief Fund FAQs at 6 (last accessed June 9, 2020).

[4] “HHS is distributing an additional $20 billion of the General Distribution to providers to augment their initial allocation so that $50 billion is allocated proportional to providers’ share of 2018 gross receipts or sales/program service revenue.  The allocation methodology is designed to provide relief to providers, who bill Medicare fee-for-service, with at least 2% of that provider’s gross receipts regardless of the provider’s payer mix” (emphasis added).  See HHS, Relief Fund FAQs at 10 (last accessed June 9, 2020).

[5] See HHS, Relief Fund FAQs at 6 (last accessed June 9, 2020).

[6] See HHS, Relief Fund FAQs at 10 (last accessed June 9, 2020).

[7] See HHS, Relief Fund FAQs at 6 (last accessed June 9, 2020).  See also HHS, Relief Fund FAQs at 5 (last accessed June 9, 2020) (“HHS has not yet detailed how recoupment or repayment will work.”).

[8] See HHS, Relief Fund FAQs at 2 (last accessed June 9, 2020).

Photo of Meg S.L. Pekarske Meg S.L. Pekarske

Meg has devoted her legal practice to serving the everchanging legal needs of the hospice industry. As chair of Husch Blackwell’s Hospice and Palliative Care Practice Group, she manages the firm’s hospice practice. In working day in and day out with hospice clients …

Meg has devoted her legal practice to serving the everchanging legal needs of the hospice industry. As chair of Husch Blackwell’s Hospice and Palliative Care Practice Group, she manages the firm’s hospice practice. In working day in and day out with hospice clients across the country, Meg is intimately familiar with the operational challenges of hospices and has the experience to address the full spectrum of legal issues facing the industry, from routine regulatory compliance issues to multimillion dollar Zone Program Integrity Contractor (ZPIC), Medicaid and other government audits. Additionally, Meg routinely advises hospices on palliative care program development, innovative inpatient unit structures, fraud investigations and a wide range of contracting issues. With an extensive background in long-term care, Meg brings a unique perspective and skill set to helping hospices create successful partnerships with nursing homes and assisted living facilities and providing quality end-of-life care to patients.

Read more about Meg S.L. PekarskeEmail Meg's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
Photo of Andrew Brenton Andrew Brenton

Andrew is part of the firm’s coast-to-coast Hospice & Palliative Care Team, working with clients on a broad range of regulatory concerns, from compliance to business growth. He answers questions that might otherwise keep clients awake at night. Andrew and the team…

Andrew is part of the firm’s coast-to-coast Hospice & Palliative Care Team, working with clients on a broad range of regulatory concerns, from compliance to business growth. He answers questions that might otherwise keep clients awake at night. Andrew and the team also help navigate clients through a wide range of Medicare and Medicaid audits, fraud and repayment investigations, and contracting issues.

Read more about Andrew BrentonEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Health Care
  • Blog:
    Healthcare Law Insights
  • Organization:
    Husch Blackwell LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Stay Connected

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers

Company

  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service

Products

  • Products
  • Blogs
  • Portals
  • Twenty
  • Syndication
  • Microsites

Support

  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center

New to the Network

  • California Employment Law
  • Privacy Compliance & Data Security
  • Startup GC Business Law Insights
  • New York Surrogate's Court Monitor
  • NC Legal Landscapes
Copyright © 2021, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Powered By LexBlog