Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Both Whistleblowing and Whistleblower Awards are on the Rise

By David A. Wilson & Ben Sandlin on July 14, 2020
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

WhistlblowerWhether attributable to the pandemic effect of remote work, layoffs and furloughs, or the slew of recent substantial awards, the SEC’s whistleblower tip line is lighting up with greater frequency. Companies are understandably focused on the panoply of challenges to their businesses posed by the pandemic and its economic impacts, but they ignore heightened whistleblower risks at their peril.

Since April 1 of this year, the SEC has announced five large awards in rapid-fire succession totaling $104 million, bringing the total awarded since the beginning of this fiscal year in October 2019 to more than $114 million. This total includes an award of $50 million announced on June 4, which is the largest award to a single individual under the agency’s whistleblower program. The amount awarded so far in this fiscal year is more than the SEC has distributed in any full year.

The whistleblower program, created under the Dodd-Frank Act, authorizes bounties to be paid to individuals who provide original information that leads to successful enforcement actions that result in monetary sanctions of over $1 million. Since the program’s inception in 2011, the SEC has awarded more than $500 million to 83 individuals. Individuals who receive awards and the companies on which they “blow the whistle” are not disclosed and remain confidential. Announcements of awards, including multiple orders in which the Claims Review Staff declined to make awards to those who believed they were entitled to one, are available on the SEC’s whistleblower website.

The rate of tips coming into the SEC has soared. According to co-director of the Enforcement Division, Steven Peikin, in the first two months since remote work arrangements began spreading across the country in mid-March, the Commission received approximately 4,000 tips—35% more than it received in the same period last year. Lawyers close to the program speculate that as employees work away from the prying eyes and ears of their colleagues or have been furloughed or laid off, the reluctance to risk being ostracized or to just step forward may be easing. Another possibility is that the publicity about large awards has provided an incentive for employees to come forward to the SEC. Finally, because (according to co-director Peikin) many of the tips are COVID-19-related, it may be that there has been an uptick in the kind of conduct that employees believe is unlawful or inappropriate. The SEC’s Office of the Whistleblower is still getting tips in traditional areas such as accounting fraud, insider trading, money laundering and other types of alleged securities law violations.

So, what should companies do about this heightened risk? The answer is that they should make sure that the policies and procedures they have in place to encourage employees to report internally are well known within the company and that when concerns are raised internally, they are responded to and acted upon. The SEC’s April 16 report about the $27 million award announced that day stated that the whistleblower had repeatedly tried to get management’s attention about his or her concerns before going to the SEC. Pronouncements by SEC Enforcement Division senior leadership this year make clear that companies will not be able to use the COVID-19 crisis as an excuse for misconduct or for failing to follow compliance policies or failing to commit adequate resources to compliance.

Of course, with travel restrictions currently in place at many companies, conducting meaningful internal investigations of internal complaints poses particular challenges for companies with multiple sites, especially those with international operations. Several of the recent Whistleblower Program awards have had international dimensions, and with foreign governments regulating business openings and engaging in stimulus programs, the risks of bribery are likely heightened. Internal reports of serious misconduct should generally be investigated with careful document collection and in-person interviews, which may be challenging to undertake in the current environment.

Among the many challenges companies face in this new era is maintaining a strong commitment to compliance by making sure their policies and procedures are up to date based on best practices in the present reality. As always, prompt attention to internal reports or complaints about misconduct or fraud is a must in order to address misconduct promptly and convey to employees that the culture of compliance at the company remains strong.

 

Photo of David A. Wilson David A. Wilson

David has 30+ years of experience representing a wide array of businesses and individuals in complex civil litigation, internal and government investigations, and securities enforcement matters. He also helps companies design and implement programs for international anticorruption compliance. His clients look to him…

David has 30+ years of experience representing a wide array of businesses and individuals in complex civil litigation, internal and government investigations, and securities enforcement matters. He also helps companies design and implement programs for international anticorruption compliance. His clients look to him as a trusted advisor who understands their businesses and looks for not only the legal, but the practical solution to problems.

David has represented clients in dozens of investigations conducted by the Securities and Exchange Commission, congressional committees, and various federal agencies, including the U.S. Department of Justice. He has led and been involved in many internal corporate investigations, including audit committee and special committee investigations. David’s skill at building trusting, professional relationships with clients and regulators alike has proven to result in effective representations and outcomes.

Read more about David A. WilsonEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Ben Sandlin Ben Sandlin

Ben is an advocate who takes pride in representing clients when it matters most. His criminal practice includes defending clients involved in government investigations and prosecutions as well as conducting internal investigations. He has represented targets, subjects and witnesses in government investigations and…

Ben is an advocate who takes pride in representing clients when it matters most. His criminal practice includes defending clients involved in government investigations and prosecutions as well as conducting internal investigations. He has represented targets, subjects and witnesses in government investigations and prosecutions related to potential embezzlement of non-profit funds, alleged federal tax fraud, alleged securities fraud, environmental enforcement actions and others. Ben’s civil practice primarily focuses on securing or defending against immediate, emergency injunctive relief. He has experience litigating trade secret misappropriation, breaches of contract involving non-competition and non-solicitation restrictive covenants, shareholder and member disputes, breaches of fiduciary duty and fraud.

Read more about Ben SandlinEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Banking, Finance and Securities
  • Blog:
    Does Crime Pay?
  • Organization:
    Thompson Hine LLP

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo