Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

FinCEN Rule Ends AML Program Exemption for Banks that Lack a Federal Regulator

By Jeffrey M. Hanna on September 15, 2020
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
money_closeup
Department of treasury symbol

On September 15, 2020, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”) published a Final Rule bringing banks that lack a federal functional regulator further under its purview. The rule subjects these institutions to minimum standards for anti-money laundering (“AML”) requirements, including a BSA officer, AML policies and procedures, and regular employee training, among other obligations. It also extends Customer Identification Program and beneficial owner requirements to these banks.

The banks subject to this new rule include state-chartered, non-depository trust companies; non-federally insured credit unions; private banks; and other non-federally regulated banks.

The Rule, in accordance with the May 11, 2016 Customer Due Diligence Final Rule, requires minimum standards for AML programs “to ensure that all banks, regardless of whether they are subject to Federal regulation and oversight, are required to establish and implement written AML programs, including conducting ongoing customer due diligence, and to identify and verify the identity of the beneficial owners of their legal entity customers.”

FinCEN issued this rule because the gap in AML coverage between banks with and without a Federal functional regulator “presented a vulnerability to the U.S. financial system that could be exploited by bad actors . . . .” Accordingly, by implementing this Rule, FinCEN stated in its press release that it has eliminated the existing AML program exemption for banks without a Federal functional regulator in an effort to “ensure [BSA] coverage across the banking industry.”

The Rule will take effect on November 16, and institutions will have 180 days from the day the Final Rule was published to comply with it. Banks subject to the new rule must act now to ensure they have a robust and compliant AML program in place to meet the Rule’s requirements by the compliance deadline of March 15, 2021.

Photo of Jeffrey M. Hanna Jeffrey M. Hanna

Jeff is co-leader of the firm’s Banking Regulation & Enforcement Practice Group and a senior member of the Government Investigations & White Collar Bank Defense & Counseling and Bank Secrecy Act (BSA)/Anti-Money Laundering (AML) teams. Jeff focuses primarily on the federal Bank Secrecy…

Jeff is co-leader of the firm’s Banking Regulation & Enforcement Practice Group and a senior member of the Government Investigations & White Collar Bank Defense & Counseling and Bank Secrecy Act (BSA)/Anti-Money Laundering (AML) teams. Jeff focuses primarily on the federal Bank Secrecy Act and related state laws and regulations governing financial institutions, including banks, money services businesses (MSBs), and casinos. He regularly represents financial institutions in connection with BSA/AML obligations, including in regulatory and law enforcement investigations, examinations, and day-to-day compliance obligations.

Read more about Jeffrey M. HannaEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Banking, Finance and Securities
  • Blog:
    Subject to Inquiry
  • Organization:
    McGuireWoods LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo