Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Telehealth Physical Examinations: Turn on your camera and show me your “rash.”

By Kirk S. Davis & Danielle C. Gordet on October 21, 2020
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Physician offices have seen a dramatic increase in telehealth visits during the COVID-19 pandemic. This development has raised questions regarding the appropriate standard of care when performing a telehealth examination, in particular the “physical examination.” Naturally this blog can never supplant the physician’s expertise in evaluating patients. As in other contexts, physicians practicing telemedicine should strive to act reasonably to provide quality patient care.

Reasonableness

Physicians must always follow this standard of care when conducting examinations.  To avoid potential medical malpractice claims, physicians are obligated to act “in accordance with the prevailing professional standard of care by a reasonably prudent similar health care provider.” See, e.g., Fla. Stat. § 766.102(2)(a).  The standard for telehealth examinations is no different. The Florida telehealth statute states: “A telehealth provider has the duty to practice in a manner consistent with his or her scope of practice and the prevailing professional standard of practice for a health care professional who provides in-person health care services to patients in this state.” Fla. Stat. § 456.47(2)(a).

Many providers are unsure how to provide the same standard of care during telehealth examinations without the face-to-face physical examination that they provided during in-person visits. The American Medical Association (AMA) encourages physicians to recognize the limitations of telehealth and “ensure that they have the information they need to make well-grounded clinical recommendations [ ].” AMA Code of Medical Ethics Opinion 1.2.12. Additionally, the AMA suggests that if telehealth does not appear to be appropriate for the patient – it should not be utilized.

The Telehealth Ten

The authors of a recent American Journal of Medicine article, “The Telehealth Ten: A Guide for a Patient-Assisted Virtual Physical Examination,” attempts to address physicians’ concerns. “The Telehealth Ten” list assists physicians in conducting thorough virtual visits.  The article outlines objective questions for the physician in this “patient-assisted physical examination.” The categories of the Telehealth Ten are listed below. The details within the above-referenced article can assist physicians in obtaining a clearer picture of a patient’s medical issues during telehealth sessions.

  • Step 1:       Vital Signs: Think wearable devices, prior medical assisted measurement by ancillary staff, or even questionnaires to be answered by the patients in a secure environment.
  • Step 2:       Skin: Have the patient perform a self-assessment and identify any new bruises, rashes, lacerations, psoriasis plaques.
  • Step 3:       Head, Eyes, Ears, Nose, and Throat: Can the patient hear you?  Is the patient’s vision and sense of smell appropriate?
  • Step 4:       Neck: Have patients look over both shoulders and describe pain or limitations. Do they have pain upon swallowing?
  • Step 5:       Lungs: Does the patient exhibit cough, wheezing, or impairment upon deep respiration?
  • Step 6:       Heart: Wearable devices may provide the most definitive results, but vital signs are a first step.
  • Step 7:       Abdomen: If tender or distended, the patient may need to have an in-person evaluation.
  • Step 8:       Extremities: “Do you have warm or cold fingertips or toes? Is one calf more swollen than the other?  Put your hands around and check them.”  Ask the patients to show you.
  • Step 9:       Neurological: Do the patients exhibit any hand or arm tremors or any proximal leg weakness as they rise from a seated position?
  • Step 10:     Social Determinants: Does the patient report any changes in physical activity, sleep, stress, support from others? Ask the patients if they get enough food and medicine and if they are safe at home.

The doctor will see you now.

Telehealth is a huge advantage for physicians and a convenience for patients.  The federal government has expanded Medicare coverage of telehealth services to encourage physicians and patients to use them to avoid the risks of contracting COVID-19. (See here). The list of covered telehealth services is continually expanding. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services announced on October 14, 2020, that they added 11 new services to those that Medicare will pay for during the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency. (See here). Recognizing the advantages of telehealth, President Trump issued an Executive Order on August 3, 2020 that makes many of the COVID-19 telehealth policies permanent. Accordingly, physicians should now ensure that they know how to properly conduct telehealth examinations so the appropriate standards of care are met.

 

Photo of Kirk S. Davis Kirk S. Davis

An accomplished litigator, Kirk Davis represents hospitals and health systems in complex regulatory compliance issues and disputes with a focus on medical malpractice and peer review hearings. Kirk has decades of experience in the peer review process and has been involved in all…

An accomplished litigator, Kirk Davis represents hospitals and health systems in complex regulatory compliance issues and disputes with a focus on medical malpractice and peer review hearings. Kirk has decades of experience in the peer review process and has been involved in all aspects of hearings, from prosecuting physicians to defending medical staff and serving as a hearing officer. He helps hospitals comply with federal and state laws by recommending peer review best practices and procedures. In addition to his work on medical malpractice matters, Kirk handles disputes between physicians in private practices and effectively resolves contentious medical practice dissolution through alternative dispute resolution. Kirk has served as an arbitrator in various healthcare-related matters and is a sought after speaker on health law topics. He is Board Certified in Health Law by The Florida Bar and recognized by Chambers USA as a leading lawyer in healthcare.

Read more about Kirk S. DavisEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Danielle C. Gordet Danielle C. Gordet

Danielle Gordet focuses her practice on healthcare, including healthcare compliance, conflicts of interest, scope of practice issues, physician contracting, and regulations. Her ability to identify, investigate, and resolve complex issues in collaboration with healthcare administrators allows her to provide them with effective counsel…

Danielle Gordet focuses her practice on healthcare, including healthcare compliance, conflicts of interest, scope of practice issues, physician contracting, and regulations. Her ability to identify, investigate, and resolve complex issues in collaboration with healthcare administrators allows her to provide them with effective counsel in developing policies and procedures which reduce the risk of inappropriate conduct and prevent non-compliance. She provides expertise on federal and state healthcare statutory and regulatory issues, including adherence to the Stark Law, the Anti-Kickback Statute, and licensure compliance. In addition, Danielle assists manufacturers of U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulated products in obtaining necessary FDA clearances for their devices. Danielle works with healthcare administrators on resolving a variety of legal matters, including issues surrounding hospital bylaws, licensure and credentialing, telemedicine, codes of conduct, and Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act. On behalf of healthcare providers, she negotiates and drafts contractual agreements including medical directorships, physician employment, clinical trials, and consulting arrangements.

Read more about Danielle C. GordetEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Health Care and Life Sciences
  • Blog:
    Health Law Rx
  • Organization:
    Akerman LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo