Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
CommunitySub-MenuPublishersChannelsProductsSub-MenuBlog ProBlog PlusBlog PremierMicrositeSyndication PortalsAboutContactResourcesSubscribeSupport
Join
Search
Close

Switzerland: a public referendum on human rights due diligence for Swiss-based companies

By Christelle Coslin & Margaux Renard on November 26, 2020
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

As expected, a public referendum as regards the Responsible Business Initiative (“RBI”) – i.e. a proposal launched in April 2015 by a coalition of Swiss civil society organisations on mandatory human rights due diligence for Swiss-based companies – will take place on 29 November 2020.

Due diligence obligation and liability for Swiss-based companies

The RBI takes the form of a suggested amendment to the Swiss Federal Constitution, which would result in the introduction of a new Article 101a “Responsibility of business” in the Constitution. Under the amendment, Swiss-based companies would be legally obliged to take into account respect for human rights in all their business activities, including activities conducted abroad, and may face the associated liability and litigation risks attached to non-compliance with the obligation to carry out “appropriate due diligence”.

Scope of due diligence obligation and liability for Swiss-based companies

Under Swiss Law, a counter-proposal may be prepared by the Federal Council (i.e. Swiss Government) or the Swiss Parliament. The counter-proposal eventually enters into force if accepted by the supporters of the initial proposal.

The Council of States (i.e. the Swiss Parliament’s upper house) and the National Council (i.e. the Swiss Parliament’s lower house) prepared diverging counter-proposals. While the Council of States’ counterproposal stood for a limited set of obligations concerning reporting and specific due diligence and contained no liability rules, the National Council’ counter-proposal focused on general parent company liability rules and broad due diligence obligations.

Although the organisers of the RBI stated they would withdraw their initiative if the stricter counter-proposal – with parent company liability rules and broad mandatory due diligence – were adopted, the Swiss Parliament voted on 2 June 2020 for the softer approach with due diligence obligations limited to child labor and mining conflicts and which does not contain any liability rules.

Swiss due diligence initiative set for a public referendum

As a result, the organisers of the RBI did not withdraw their proposal. Swiss voters will thus have to go to the polls this Sunday (29 November 2020) to decide whether the RBI should be accepted or rejected. If the RBI is dismissed by the Swiss population, the counter-proposal adopted by the Swiss Parliament would enter into force.

This means that, regardless of which of the proposal or counter-proposal prevails in the vote, Switzerland will definitely join the countries having enacted a body of rules regulating human rights due diligence next week.

 

Photo of Christelle Coslin Christelle Coslin
Read more about Christelle CoslinEmail
Photo of Margaux Renard Margaux Renard
Read more about Margaux RenardEmail
  • Posted in:
    Administrative
  • Blog:
    Focus on Regulation
  • Organization:
    Hogan Lovells
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog, Inc. logo
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers
99 Park Row
  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Products
  • Blog Pro
  • Blog Plus
  • Blog Premier
  • Microsite
  • Syndication Portals
  • LexBlog Community
  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center

New to the Network

  • Scott Technology Attorneys Blog
  • Joe Raczynski | Technologist
  • Coronavirus (COVID-19): Guidance for Businesses
  • GovCon & Trade
  • Pro Policyholder
Copyright © 2022, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo