Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Critical Analysis and Practical Implications of CMS’ Changes to the Stark Law’s Implementing Regulations

By Michael Paddock, Erica Kraus, Theresa Thompson & Susan Ingargiola on December 11, 2020
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Healthcare-Medical-Technology-Blog-Image-660x283

As mentioned in our November 25, 2000 Healthcare Law Blog article, “Big Changes for Health Care Fraud and Abuse: HHS Gifts Providers Updates to the Stark Law and the AKS, Just in Time for the Holidays,” the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) published a final rule (“Final Rule”) on December 2, 2020 making significant changes to the regulatory framework implementing the federal physician self-referral prohibition (the “Stark Law”), 42 C.F.R. 411.351 et seq.

Sheppard Mullin is pleased to now present “Critical Analysis and Practical Implications of CMS’ Changes to the Stark Law’s Implementing Regulations” (“Critical Analysis”), a comprehensive analysis of the Final Rule.  This Critical Analysis is designed not as an alert or summary of the Final Rule, but rather as a comprehensive examination of the Final Rule and the changes made to the Stark Law regulations through the Final Rule.  In addition, the Critical Analysis compares the regulatory changes as originally proposed by CMS in its October 17, 2019 proposed rule to those changes that were finalized in the Final Rule.  Finally, the Critical Analysis includes a thorough analysis of each regulatory change made to the Stark Law regulations by the Final Rule, a discussion of each changes’ practical implications for physicians and entities, and a review of remaining open questions.  In short, we hope the Critical Analysis will serve as resource for you now and into the future.

Sheppard Mullin’s critical analysis of the Office of Inspector General’s contemporaneously published final rule implementing the federal health care program Anti-Kickback Statute is forthcoming.

Photo of Michael Paddock Michael Paddock

Michael Paddock is a partner in the Governmental Practice in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office.

Read more about Michael PaddockEmail
Photo of Erica Kraus Erica Kraus

Erica Kraus is a partner in the Corporate Practice Group in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office.

Read more about Erica KrausEmail
Photo of Theresa Thompson Theresa Thompson

Theresa Thompson is an associate in the Corporate and Securities Practice Group in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office.

Read more about Theresa ThompsonEmail
Photo of Susan Ingargiola Susan Ingargiola

Susan Ingargiola is an associate in the Corporate Practice Group in the firm’s New York office and a member of the healthcare team.

Read more about Susan IngargiolaEmail
  • Posted in:
    Health Care and Life Sciences
  • Blog:
    Healthcare Law Blog
  • Organization:
    Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo