Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

Commerce Finds Dumping and Countervailable Subsidization of Wood Mouldings and Millwork Products from China

By Camron Greer & Turner Kim on December 30, 2020
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On December 29, 2020, the U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) announced its final determinations in the antidumping (“AD”) and countervailing duty (“CVD”) investigations of imports of wood mouldings and millwork products from Brazil (AD only) and China (AD and CVD). Commerce made a negative final determination in the Brazil investigation, while its determinations for the China investigations were affirmative. See the fact sheet for a summary the final cash deposit rates and margins.

As a result of the negative determination in the Brazil investigation, Commerce calculated and assigned final dumping rates of 0% for the Brazilian mandatory respondents and all other Brazilian exporters. In the China investigation, Commerce calculated and assigned a final dumping rate of 44.60% (33.87% adjusted for subsidies) to mandatory respondent Fujian Yinfeng Imp & Exp Trading Co., Ltd./Fujian Province Youxi City Mangrove Wood Machining Co., Ltd. Commerce calculated a China-Wide entity rate of 230.36% (219.63% adjusted for subsidies), which also included mandatory respondent Bel Trade Wood Industrial Co., Ltd. Youxi Fujian. All non-selected Chinese exporters/producers which applied for a separate rate have been assigned a rate of 44.60% (33.87% adjusted for subsidies).

Commerce calculated and assigned final subsidy rates of 20.56% and 252.29% to exporters/producers Fujian Yinfeng Imp & Exp Trading Co., Ltd. and Fujian Nanping Yuanqiao Wood Industry Co., Ltd., respectively. The latter rate of 252.29% was based on total adverse facts available. Commerce assigned a subsidy rate of 20.56% for all other Chinese exporters/producers.

The ITC is currently scheduled to make its final determinations on or about February 11, 2021. If the ITC makes affirmative final determinations of material injury to domestic industry, then Commerce will issue AD and CVD orders instructing Customs and Border Protection (“CBP”) to collect deposits based on the applicable duty rate. If the ITC makes negative determinations of injury, then the investigations will be terminated.

Husch Blackwell is monitoring the outcome of the AD and CVD investigations closely and will provide an update on the ITC’s final determinations when available. Should you have any questions or concerns regarding Commerce’s final determinations pertaining to imports of wood mouldings and millwork products from Brazil and/or China, please contact our International Trade and Supply Chain team.

Photo of Camron Greer Camron Greer

A trade analyst, Camron researches transitions in global trade policy and their impact on client business matters. Camron assists clients, attorneys and legal teams when trade, business and the law intersect.

Email
Photo of Turner Kim Turner Kim

A trade analyst, Turner conducts industry research and analyzes trade data to assist attorneys with client proceedings at the U.S. International Trade Commission, U.S. Department of Commerce and U.S. Court of International Trade. He also actively monitors U.S. government and global trade developments…

A trade analyst, Turner conducts industry research and analyzes trade data to assist attorneys with client proceedings at the U.S. International Trade Commission, U.S. Department of Commerce and U.S. Court of International Trade. He also actively monitors U.S. government and global trade developments for issues relating to client’s most critical trade matters.

Email
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Antitrust, Competition and Trade
  • Blog:
    International Trade Insights
  • Organization:
    Husch Blackwell LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo