Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

The CFPB Revises Reg. Z’s Qualified Mortgage Loan Criteria in Anticipation of the GSE Patch’s Expiration

By Paul Boller & David M. Gettings on January 10, 2021
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

In anticipation of the “GSE patch” expiring, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) issued several final rules in 2020 to amend Regulation Z (“Reg. Z”). Concerns have existed that the expiration of the GSE patch would restrict consumer mortgage credit unless the CFPB created a permanent version of the GSE patch or revised the General Qualified Mortgage (“QM”) definition. As outlined below, the CFPB has responded by adopting the latter approach.

Since 2014, the GSE patch has allowed certain mortgage loans eligible for purchase or guarantee by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (“GSEs”) to qualify as QM loans despite not meeting all requirements of the General QM loan definition. This has been important because QM loans receive certain protections from legal liabilities associated with not complying with Reg. Z’s Ability to Repay/Qualified Mortgage Rule. But the GSE patch was only designed as a temporary measure, and as such was scheduled to expire on January 10, 2021, or would expire for a respective GSE upon it exiting conservatorship.

On December 10, 2020, the CFPB issued the General QM Final Rule which replaces the 43 percent debt-to-income (“DTI”) limit in the General QM loan definition with a price-based threshold that compares a loan’s annual percentage rate to the average prime offer rate for a comparable loan. It appears the CFPB adopted this approach in part because its’ research indicated that removing the DTI limit would help “facilitate a smooth and orderly transition” from the GSE patch. The General QM Final Rule outlines the price-based threshold approach and makes other changes to Reg. Z.

While still requiring a lender to consider and verify borrowers’ income and liabilities, the General QM Final Rule also removes the Appendix Q verification standard and makes it so a lender can receive safe harbor for compliance with the QM verification requirement if it satisfies one or more of the third-party verification standards referenced by Reg. Z.

The CFPB also issued on December 10, 2020, the Seasoned QM Final Rule, which creates a “Seasoned QM” definition. Specifically, certain first-lien, fixed-rate residential mortgage loans become QM loans if, during a defined seasoning period, they meet specific payment performance criteria and are held in portfolio by the originating lender. The Seasoned QM Final Rule does contain some exceptions to the portfolio requirement, including a single transfer of the loan where it is not securitized as part of the transfer or before the end of the seasoning period. The seasoning period is generally 36 months.

Both final rules become effective on March 1, 2021. The General QM Final Rule, however, has a separate mandatory compliance date of July 1, 2021. Because the CFPB extended the GSE patch’s January expiration date to coincide with the General QM Final Rule’s mandatory compliance date, the GSE patch will remain available for loans where a lender receives the application before July 1, 2021. Lenders must, however, comply with the General QM Final Rule on loans where the application is received on or after July 1, 2021.

Lenders should carefully review the final rules to identify all the resulting changes and to determine how those changes will impact their current origination and compliance strategies.

Photo of Paul Boller Paul Boller

Paul Boller helps clients navigate a variety of federal and state statutory and regulatory requirements in consumer financial services.

Read more about Paul BollerEmailPaul's Linkedin Profile
Photo of David M. Gettings David M. Gettings

Dave is a partner of the firm who focuses on defending clients in consumer class actions and complex commercial litigation nationwide, particularly cases involving a variety of federal and state laws and regulations, including the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), the Telephone Consumer

…

Dave is a partner of the firm who focuses on defending clients in consumer class actions and complex commercial litigation nationwide, particularly cases involving a variety of federal and state laws and regulations, including the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) and associated FCC regulations, the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, the Truth in Lending Act, the Electronic Fund Transfer Act, and many similar state consumer protection statutes.

Read more about David M. GettingsEmailDavid M.'s Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Administrative and Regulatory, Banking, Finance and Securities
  • Blog:
    Regulatory Oversight
  • Organization:
    Troutman Pepper Locke
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo