Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Improper Billing of “P-Stim” Devices is Focus of Recent FCA Settlements

By John Eason on January 14, 2021
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Improper billing for electro-acupuncture using a “P-Stim” device (or peri-auricular stimulation device) has been the subject of two False Claims Act (FCA) settlements already in 2021, following a trend of such enforcement actions within the past year.

Each of the recent settlements, detailed further below, involve providers billing federal healthcare programs for acupuncture using P-Stim devices under HCPCS Code L8649.  Unlike P-Stim devices, though, which are attached to the ears of a patient using needles and adhesives without surgery or anesthesia, HCPCS Code L8649 applies to a product that is surgically implanted into a patient using anesthesia. Medicare, TRICARE and the Federal Employees Health Benefit Program (FEHBP) do not reimburse for acupuncture devices like P-Stim, nor do they reimburse for P-Stim as a neurostimulator or an implantation of neurostimulator electrodes.  In addition to P-Stim, the brand names for these devices include ANSiStim, E-pulse, Stivax and NeuroStim.

Notably, none of these enforcement actions originated from qui tam whistleblowers but rather were the product of affirmative government investigations by the U.S. Department of Justice, U.S. Attorneys’ Offices, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (HHS-OIG), and CMS’s Center for Program Integrity. These settlements—coming from different jurisdictions and concerning different types of providers and practices—demonstrate the government’s ongoing, nationwide effort to investigate the improper billing of electro-acupuncture devices:

  • On January 12, 2021, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Texas announced that a spinal decompression clinic had agreed to pay $330,898 to settle FCA allegations that it improperly billed Medicare for the implantation of 41 neuro-stimulators and was reimbursed over $177,000, when in fact the clinic had applied P-Stim devices in an office setting.
  • On January 4, 2021, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Tennessee announced a settlement totaling $1.72 million with three healthcare providers and owners of medical practices to resolve FCA allegations that they billed Medicare and TennCare for acupuncture using P-Stim devices under the HCPCS Code L8649. One of the individual provider-owners, James P. Anderson, M.D., agreed to pay $1 million over five years to settle the allegations and enter into an Integrity Agreement with HHS-OIG that requires regular monitoring of billing practices for three years.
  • On September 21, 2020, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania announced a settlement totaling more than $1 million with a neurosurgery practice, neurosurgeon, and practice director to resolve, in part, allegations that the practice billed Medicare, TRICARE, and the FEHBP over 19months for the surgical implantation of neuro-stimulators, when instead a physician assistant had applied P-Stim and Stivax devices.  According to the government’s press release, the neurosurgeon has since sued the marketers who allegedly pushed him to bill federal healthcare programs for the use of these devices.
  • On August 25, 2020, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Texas announced that a pain management physician had agreed to pay $530,000 to settle FCA allegations that he improperly billed for the application of electro-acupuncture devices over five months. Qlarant, the Unified Program Integrity Contractor for Medicare, assisted HHS-OIG and CMS in their investigation of this matter.
  • On August 21, 2020, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Georgia announced that a medical practice had been ordered to pay more than $4.3 million, and the practice’s owner and chiropractor ordered to pay $700,000, to resolve FCA allegations that the practice billed Medicare for surgical implantation of hundreds of neurostimulators and was reimbursed more than $1.4 million when it actually used P-Stim devices.
  • On June 30, 2020, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Texas announced that an anesthesiologist had agreed to pay $100,000 to resolve FCA allegations that he falsely billed Medicare for the application of electro-acupuncture devices over five months. Qlarant also assisted HHS-OIG and CMS in their investigation of these allegations.

Look for coverage of all other FCA settlements from 2020 within our Healthcare Fraud and Abuse Review, which will be published in the coming weeks. For more information regarding FCA updates and enforcement trends, contact a member of the Bass, Berry & Sims Healthcare Fraud Task Force.

Photo of John Eason John Eason

John Eason focuses his practice on representing clients in government enforcement actions, investigations, and related litigation, particularly involving the False Claims Act (FCA). John has represented companies and individuals, particularly in the healthcare industry, in responding to inquiries and investigations by the Department…

John Eason focuses his practice on representing clients in government enforcement actions, investigations, and related litigation, particularly involving the False Claims Act (FCA). John has represented companies and individuals, particularly in the healthcare industry, in responding to inquiries and investigations by the Department of Justice, U.S. Attorneys’ Offices, Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services, and other federal and state agencies, regarding healthcare and procurement fraud issues.

Read more about John EasonEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Health Care and Life Sciences
  • Blog:
    Inside the False Claims Act
  • Organization:
    Bass, Berry & Sims PLC
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo