Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Federal Court appeal: Urogynaecological medical devices.

By Bill Madden on March 5, 2021
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Reasons were published today by the Full Court of the Federal Court in Ethicon Sàrl v Gill [2021] FCAFC 29, (available on the Federal Court website).

In a single judgment of the Court (Jagot, Murphy & Lee JJ) the appeal by the respondent / defendant was dismissed, subject to the Court  being satisfied it is appropriate to vary the order by which the primary judge’s findings are binding on group members and providing greater specificity to the answer to common question 22 (why was the conduct misleading or deceptive).

. 

  • Posted in:
    Health Care and Life Sciences
  • Blog:
    Bill Madden's Blog
  • Organization:
    Bill Madden
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo