Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

CFPB Issues Interpretive Rule Clarifying that ECOA’s Prohibition of Discrimination Based on Sex Extends to Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity

By Jean Veta & Lucille Bartholomew on March 10, 2021
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On March 9, 2021, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB” or “Bureau”) issued an interpretive rule clarifying that the Equal Opportunity Credit Act (“ECOA”) and its implementing regulation, Regulation B, prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity.  The CFPB made clear that this prohibition also extends to “actual or perceived nonconformity with traditional sex- or gender-based stereotypes, and discrimination based on an applicant’s social or other association.”  Specifically, the Bureau found that, under ECOA and Regulation B:

  • (1) “sexual orientation discrimination and gender identity discrimination necessarily involve consideration of sex”;
  • (2) “an applicant’s sex must be a ‘but for’ cause of the injury, but need not be the only cause”; and
  • (3) “discrimination against individuals, and not merely against groups, is covered.”

In supporting the interpretive rule, the CFPB referenced its 2016 response to an inquiry from Services & Advocacy for GLBT Elders, where it suggested that the statutory language of ECOA—specifically, ECOA’s prohibition against sex discrimination—extends to prohibiting discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity.  The Bureau also referenced the Supreme Court’s decision in Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia, 40 S. Ct. 1731, 207 L. Ed. 2d 218 (2020), which held that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act prohibited discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity.  The rule follows the Bureau’s Request for Information (“RFI”), issued on July 28, 2020, regarding credit discrimination and responsible innovation under ECOA and Regulation B, which asked how the Bostock decision should affect the Bureau’s interpretation of ECOA.  The Bureau also signaled its support for the Equality Act, which would codify protections for consumers against sexual orientation and gender identity discrimination with respect to financial products and services.

In the press release for the interpretive rule, Acting Director Uejio stated:  “The CFPB will ensure that consumers are protected against such discrimination and provided equal opportunities in credit.”  The release also indicated that, “where appropriate, the CFPB will take enforcement action under ECOA to hold financial institutions accountable for their actions that violate ECOA.”  As such, financial institutions should consider reviewing their current lending practices with an eye toward the treatment—both intentional and unintentional—of customers based on sexual orientation and gender identity, and carefully review the examples provided in the interpretive rule.

Photo of Jean Veta Jean Veta

Jean Veta is described by Chambers USA as “one of the premier banking and financial regulatory enforcement litigators in the country.” She defends financial institutions and their officers and directors in civil and regulatory enforcement matters, government investigations, internal corporate investigations, and congressional…

Jean Veta is described by Chambers USA as “one of the premier banking and financial regulatory enforcement litigators in the country.” She defends financial institutions and their officers and directors in civil and regulatory enforcement matters, government investigations, internal corporate investigations, and congressional investigations.
Jean regularly represents clients on the full range of regulatory enforcement issues, including:

advising on safety and soundness issues, UDAAP and other consumer compliance issues, fair lending, anti-money laundering, securities issues, and FIRREA and False Claims Act investigations.
appearing before the federal bank regulators, the CFPB, FinCEN, the Department of Justice, the SEC, and state attorneys general and bank regulators.

Jean’s pro bono work includes:

filing amicus briefs on behalf of over 20 professional medical associations in opposition to state laws that would ban gender affirming medical care for transgender adolescents. Amici include the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Medical Association, and the American Psychiatric Association.
filing an amicus brief in support of transgender students’ rights. Amici include the National Association of Social Workers, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the American Medical Association.
representing civil rights organizations, an interfaith group of clergy, and four same-sex couples in support of Washington DC’s marriage equality.
representing pro-choice organizations in Congressional investigations into fetal tissue research and late-term abortion.

Jean is ranked in Chambers USA’s Band 1 for Banking Enforcement and Investigations. She was named by The American Lawyer as Litigator of the Week and by Best Lawyers in America as “Washington’s Lawyer of the Year for Banking and Finance Litigation” and “Washington’s Lawyer of the Year for Financial Services Regulatory Law.”

Jean serves as a Commissioner on the American Bar Association’s Commission on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity. Previously, Jean was a member of the ABA’s Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary, which provides an impartial evaluation of the professional qualifications of all federal judicial nominees. As the Standing Committee’s representative for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, Jean served as a principal evaluator of then Supreme Court nominee, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s professional qualifications to serve on the Court. Jean testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee regarding Justice Jackson’s integrity, professional competence, and judicial temperament. On April 7, 2022, Justice Jackson was confirmed by the Senate to replace Justice Stephen Breyer.

Jean also serves as the DC Bar’s Delegate to the ABA House of Delegates.

During President Clinton’s administration, Jean served as:

Deputy Associate Attorney General, United States Department of Justice (2000-2001)
Deputy General Counsel, United States Department of Education (1998-2000)

As described in Chambers USA, one client said “She’s at the top of her game and top of the industry. She has a keen intellect, and a commanding knowledge of the law, excellent judgment and a passion for zealous representation of her client. You can do no better than to have Jean on your side. She’s the leader in her field.”

Read more about Jean VetaEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Lucille Bartholomew Lucille Bartholomew

Lucy Bartholomew defends banks, consumer reporting agencies, and other financial services providers and their officers and directors in connection with civil and regulatory enforcement matters and internal investigations. Lucy represents clients throughout all stages of enforcement matters, including civil investigative demand negotiations, document…

Lucy Bartholomew defends banks, consumer reporting agencies, and other financial services providers and their officers and directors in connection with civil and regulatory enforcement matters and internal investigations. Lucy represents clients throughout all stages of enforcement matters, including civil investigative demand negotiations, document production, response preparation, civil investigational hearings, the NORA/15-day letter process, and settlement resolution. She regularly appears before the federal banking agencies, FTC, CFPB, and other federal and state regulators.

Lucy also maintains an active financial services regulatory practice and specializes in UDAAP, credit reporting, fair lending, fees, error resolution, consumer credit, and advertising. 

Read more about Lucille BartholomewEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Banking, Finance and Securities
  • Blog:
    Cov Financial Services
  • Organization:
    Covington & Burling LLP

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo