Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

CFPB Proposes to Delay the Mandatory Compliance Date of the New General Qualified Mortgage Final Rule

By Paul Boller & David M. Gettings on March 11, 2021
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On February 23, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) issued a statement that it planned to propose a rule to “delay the July 1, 2021 mandatory compliance date of the General QM Final Rule.” Consistent with that, the CFPB announced a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) on March 3, which would push back the current mandatory compliance date for the General Qualified Mortgage (QM) Final Rule to October 1, 2022. This would significantly extend the “GSE patch” and may be a sign of more things to come.

As discussed more fully in a prior post, the General QM Final Rule was created to address the expiration of the GSE patch, which permits certain mortgage loans eligible for purchase or guarantee by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (GSEs) to qualify as QM loans despite not meeting all requirements of the General QM loan definition. It does this by removing a 43% debt-to-income (DTI) limit contained in the General QM loan definition and replaces it with a price-based threshold approach.

Under the General QM Final Rule, which became effective on March 1, lenders can still use the old General QM loan definition or the GSE patch to originate QM loans where the loan application was received before July 1, 2021. The proposed rule would make this the case until October 1, 2022. The CFPB believes, in light of the current financial difficulties created by the COVID-19 pandemic, the extension “may help ensure stability and access to affordable, responsible credit in the mortgage market.”

Since assuming the reigns of the agency, Acting Director Dave Uejio has made it clear that the CFPB will assume a more proactive and assertive role. Consistent with this, the CFPB indicated in its February statement that it is still considering whether to “initiate another rulemaking to reconsider other aspects of the General QM Final Rule.” In a similar manner, the CFPB indicated it’s also considering whether to initiate a rulemaking to amend or revoke the recently enacted Seasoned QM Final Rule.

Overall, lenders should expect to see more developments regarding the recently enacted General and Seasoned QM Final Rules. The CFPB is accepting comments on the NPRM until April 5.

Photo of Paul Boller Paul Boller

Paul Boller helps clients navigate a variety of federal and state statutory and regulatory requirements in consumer financial services.

Read more about Paul BollerEmailPaul's Linkedin Profile
Photo of David M. Gettings David M. Gettings

Dave is a partner of the firm who focuses on defending clients in consumer class actions and complex commercial litigation nationwide, particularly cases involving a variety of federal and state laws and regulations, including the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), the Telephone Consumer

…

Dave is a partner of the firm who focuses on defending clients in consumer class actions and complex commercial litigation nationwide, particularly cases involving a variety of federal and state laws and regulations, including the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) and associated FCC regulations, the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, the Truth in Lending Act, the Electronic Fund Transfer Act, and many similar state consumer protection statutes.

Read more about David M. GettingsEmailDavid M.'s Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Banking, Finance and Securities
  • Blog:
    Regulatory Oversight
  • Organization:
    Troutman Pepper Locke
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo