Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Commerce Department Issues Significant New Export Controls in Response to Myanmar Coup

By Nicholas Turner, Ed Krauland, Meredith Rathbone, Wendy Wysong, Ali Burney & Peter Jeydel on March 11, 2021
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On March 8, 2021, the US Commerce Department’s Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) published amendments to the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) imposing new export control restrictions on Myanmar (Burma) and adding four entities to the Entity List, in response to a military coup in early February 2021.

The BIS announcements follow the imposition of sanctions on 12 individuals and three entities by the US Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), pursuant to Executive Order 14041 of February 10, 2021.

In addition to designating major military-linked commercial entities to the Entity List, the new EAR amendments make Myanmar ineligible for certain license exceptions and add Myanmar to the list of countries subject to BIS’s military end use / military end user rule (the MEU Rule)—alongside China, Russia, and Venezuela.

For background on the US government’s previous Myanmar-related measures in response to the recent coup, including Executive Order (EO) 14014, see our blog post of February 12, 2021, “Biden Administration Announces Sanctions and Export Controls in Response to Myanmar Coup.”

Additions to the Entity List

BIS announced the addition of four Myanmar-based entities to the Entity List:

  • Ministry of Defence;
  • Ministry of Home Affairs;
  • Myanmar Economic Corporation (MEC); and
  • Myanmar Economic Holdings Limited (MEHL).

As a result, BIS now requires a license for exports, reexports, and in-country transfers of all items subject to the EAR to any of the four entities above. BIS will review applications for licenses with a presumption of denial, and the four entities are no longer eligible for any license exceptions under the EAR.

Both MEC and MEHL had been previously designated as Specially Designated Nationals (SDNs) under OFAC’s earlier Myanmar-related sanctions program, which was terminated in October 2016 following the country’s democratic reforms, but they were not included in OFAC’s recent SDN designations under EO 14014.

The Entity List restrictions only apply to the listed entities themselves, although BIS advises enhanced due diligence and possibly other compliance measures as well when dealing with a subsidiary or other affiliate of a listed entity.  MEC and MEHL are broadly present in numerous sectors of Myanmar’s economy, adding compliance risk and burden to trade in items subject to the EAR (including “EAR99”) with Myanmar when dealing with an affiliated entity either MEC or MEHL.

Fewer License Exceptions and New License Conditions

On February 18, 2021, BIS issued a Federal Register notice announcing a policy of a presumption of denial when considering license applications for items subject to the EAR destined for the Myanmar Ministry of Defense, Ministry of Home Affairs, armed forces, or security services. Additionally, BIS suspended the availability of four license exceptions previously available for Myanmar:

  • Shipments of Limited Value (LVS) (§ 740.3);
  • Shipments to Group B Countries (GBS) (§ 740.4);
  • Technology and Software under Restriction (TSR) (§ 740.6); and
  • Computers (APP) (§ 740.7).

With respect to License Exception Computers (APP) (§ 740.7), the Federal Register notice notes that Myanmar has now been moved from Computer Tier 1 to Computer Tier 3.

Under the March 8, 2021 amendments, BIS moved Myanmar from Country Group B to Country Group D:1 under Supplement No. 1 to Part 740 of the EAR. Among other changes, the move to Country Group D:1 limits the availability of the following additional license exceptions for Myanmar:

  • Temporary Imports, Exports, reexports, and Transfers (in-country) (TMP) (§ 740.9);
  • Servicing and Replacement Parts and Equipment (RPL) (§ 740.10);
  • Aircraft, Vessels, and Spacecraft (AVS) (§ 740.15);
  • Additional Permissive Reexports (APR) (§ 740.16(j)); and
  • Encryption commodities, technology, and software (ENC) (§ 740.17).

The move to Country Group D:1 imposes additional restrictions on certain microprocessors destined to military end uses and end users, under § 744.17, and certain exports and reexports to vessels and aircraft in ports in Myanmar, under § 744.7.  The change also expands the jurisdiction of the EAR over certain non-US products when produced from US-origin technology or software (if controlled for “National Security” reasons under the EAR), under the “foreign-produced direct product” rule in General Prohibition Three of the EAR, at § 736.2(b).

Military End Use/User Rule

The March 8, 2021, amendments also added Myanmar to the list of countries subject to the MEU Rule at § 744.21. The MEU Rule previously applied only to China, Russia, and Venezuela. For more information about the MEU Rule, see our blog post of April 30, 2020.

Specifically, the amendments impose a license requirement on exports, reexports, or in-country transfers of items subject to the EAR to Myanmar, when there is knowledge that the item is intended, entirely or in part, for a military end use or military end user in Myanmar. BIS will review applications for licenses with a presumption of denial.

Photo of Ed Krauland Ed Krauland

Edward J. Krauland focuses on export controls/economic sanctions. Ed’s extensive experience includes representing clients on matters involving US and multilateral economic sanctions, defense and nuclear export controls, dual-use export controls under the EAR, anti-boycott compliance, internal investigations and enforcement work, and review of…

Edward J. Krauland focuses on export controls/economic sanctions. Ed’s extensive experience includes representing clients on matters involving US and multilateral economic sanctions, defense and nuclear export controls, dual-use export controls under the EAR, anti-boycott compliance, internal investigations and enforcement work, and review of government procurement regulations in the cross-border context. His practice spans all aspects of these laws, including counseling, compliance work, transactional advice, licensing and opinion work, internal reviews, disclosures, and enforcement actions. He has served as co-chair of the International Trade Committee of the ABA Section of International Law and Practice. He is former Chairman of an ABA-wide Task Force on Gatekeeper Regulation (anti-money laundering compliance), and senior adviser to the ABA Section of International Law and Practice’s anti-money laundering committee.

Read Ed’s full bio.

Read more about Ed KraulandEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Meredith Rathbone Meredith Rathbone

Meredith Rathbone focuses on export controls and economic sanctions, and has assisted clients in the energy, manufacturing, telecommunications, information security, banking, insurance, pharmaceutical, and service industries, among many others, in navigating the requirements of the Export Administration Regulations (EAR), International Traffic in Arms…

Meredith Rathbone focuses on export controls and economic sanctions, and has assisted clients in the energy, manufacturing, telecommunications, information security, banking, insurance, pharmaceutical, and service industries, among many others, in navigating the requirements of the Export Administration Regulations (EAR), International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) and US sanctions regulations administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) and US Department of State. She regularly assists companies in developing compliance policies, conducting internal investigations, performing training, and conducting due diligence in M&A transactions. She has represented individuals and companies facing civil and criminal investigations in this area, and has also represented clients in their efforts to be removed from OFAC’s list of Specially Designated Nationals (SDNs). She is a frequent writer and speaker on export controls and sanctions topics. She is the co-chair of the American Bar Association’s Export Controls and Economic Sanctions Committee, and also serves on the Sanctions Subcommittee of the State Department’s Advisory Committee on International Economic Policy.

Read Meredith’s full bio.

Read more about Meredith RathboneEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Peter Jeydel Peter Jeydel

Peter Jeydel‘s practice focuses on US export controls and economic sanctions, including the Commerce Department’s Export Administration Regulations (EAR), the State Department’s International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR), and sanctions regulations administered by the Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)…

Peter Jeydel‘s practice focuses on US export controls and economic sanctions, including the Commerce Department’s Export Administration Regulations (EAR), the State Department’s International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR), and sanctions regulations administered by the Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) and the State Department. His practice spans all aspects of these regimes, including counseling, compliance, transactional advice, licensing and opinions, disclosures, and enforcement actions. He has also represented companies and individuals seeking de-listing from OFAC’s sanctions list. In addition, Pete has assisted clients in anti-corruption matters, including under the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), and has experience handling reviews and investigations by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS).

Read Pete’s full bio.

Read more about Peter JeydelEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Government and Public Policy
  • Blog:
    International Compliance Blog
  • Organization:
    Steptoe LLP

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo