Polsen v Harrison (No 5) [2021] NSWSC 244 (on Caselaw) saw a second application (on day 11 of the hearing) for a recusal of a trial judge, where the plaintiff argued that the judge’s apprehended bias was based on the fact that the judge’s tipstaff attended a single directions hearing on behalf of defendant 2 years ago. The defendant opposed the application.
The application was refused.