Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

ESMA proposes amendments to MiFIR transactions and reference data reporting regimes

By Hannah Meakin (UK) & Georgia Karamani (UK) on April 1, 2021
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Introduction

On 30 March 2021, the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) published a final report on the review of transaction and reference data reporting obligations under MiFIR.

The final report is prepared in accordance with Article 26(10) of MiFIR that requires ESMA to submit a report to the European Commission assessing the functioning of the transaction reporting regime under Article 26 of MiFIR.

Scope of the transaction reporting and reference data obligations

Sections 4 and 5 of the final report cover the scope of the transaction reporting and reference data obligations both in terms of entities subject to the transaction reporting obligation and in terms of instruments to be reported under both obligations. In particular, section 4.1 of the final report includes a recommendation to extend the scope of reporting requirements under Article 26 of MiFIR to UCITS and alternative investment fund management firms when they provide at least one MIFID service to third parties. With respect to the scope of financial instruments to be reported, section 5.2 includes proposals for simplification of the trading on a trading venue (ToTV) concept in light of the considerations made in the ESMA final report on the transparency regime for non-equity instruments and the trading obligation for derivatives and section 5.3 includes proposals to further align the transaction reporting obligation with the Benchmark Regulation.

Specific data elements

Sections 6, 7, 8 and 9 of the final report cover the specific data elements that should be reported under the transaction reporting obligation that are explicitly mentioned in the Level 1 provision under Article 26(3) of MiFIR. ESMA has assessed each of these data elements and for each of them has included proposals as to whether the data element should be maintained, removed, replaced or further clarified. In particular, section 8.2 of the final report recommends simplifying reporting with the removal of the short sale indicator.

Also, in sections 6, 7 and 9 ESMA sets out proposals for four additional elements to be included in the set of details to be reported in order to maximise the usage of transaction reporting data. This includes information on client categories and buyback programs as well as a specific empowerment to ESMA to specify the conditions for linking specific transactions and for identifying aggregated orders resulting in the execution of a transaction.

Interaction with EMIR and LEI

Section 12 covers the interaction with reporting obligations under EMIR and ESMA sets out proposals to ensure further alignment between the two reporting regimes. Section 13 covers the use of the LEI of the issuer of the financial instruments for reference data reporting purposes and includes proposals to enhance the effectiveness of such obligation.

Next steps

The final report has been submitted to the Commission. It is expected to feed into any review of the MiFIR transaction reporting regime.

Photo of Hannah Meakin (UK) Hannah Meakin (UK)
Read more about Hannah Meakin (UK)Email
Photo of Georgia Karamani (UK) Georgia Karamani (UK)
Read more about Georgia Karamani (UK)Email
  • Posted in:
    Banking, Finance and Securities
  • Blog:
    Global Regulation Tomorrow
  • Organization:
    Norton Rose Fulbright
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo