Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Ahead of Final Rule, U.S. Postal Service Publishes Guidance Regarding Non-Mailability of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems

By Azim Chowdhury & Galen D. Rende on April 22, 2021
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
envelope

As we have previously reported, on December 27, 2020, Congress amended the Prevent All Cigarette Trafficking (PACT) Act to apply to e-cigarettes and all vaping products (referred to in the legislation collectively as “Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems” or “ENDS”).  Under the amended PACT Act, these products are subject to the same federal and state registration, reporting requirements, and delivery restrictions as traditional cigarettes, including the prohibition on the use of the United States Postal Service (USPS) to deliver products directly to consumers.

The USPS has historically maintained an exception to this ban for tobacco products “mailed only … for business purposes between legally operating businesses that have all applicable State and Federal Government licenses or permits and are engaged in tobacco product manufacturing, distribution, wholesale, export, import, testing, investigation, or research …” (the “B2B Exception”) See 18 U.S.C. § 1716E(b)(3)(A)(i). In a proposed rule published on February 19, 2021, the USPS stated its intention to maintain this “business purposes exception” for ENDS.  Over 16,000 comments were received during the comment period.

  • In advance of the final rule, on April 19, 2021, the USPS published guidance detailing the information required in an application for exception from the non-mailability provisions of the PACT Act for ENDS products. The guidance indicates that the final rule is still expected to be published, and become immediately effective, on or about April 26, 2021 (i.e., 120 days after the amendment was enacted).
  • Although the guidance leaves it for the final rule to confirm whether, and under what circumstances, the B2B Exception will actually apply to ENDS, it provides details about the scope of information that may be required in B2B Exception applications. The guidance does state, however, that “[w]hether any ENDS mailers may ultimately be allowed to use the exceptions remains to be determined.”
  • Although the guidance states that the Agency will not accept applications prior to the publication of the final rule, the Agency did include prospective recommendations for what to include in an application. The guidance recommends including electronic copies of all relevant license and permit documentation for the applicant and for each addressee that they intend to ship to. The guidance also recommends companies start gathering relevant information now, and suggests preparing a spreadsheet that contains the following information with respect to each sender and each recipient:
    • Address
    • The Postal Service retail or business mail acceptance office(s) where each intended sender would tender shipments
    • The Postal Service retail office(s) where each intended recipient would retrieve shipments
    • A description of the business or governmental entity (e.g., battery manufacturer, retail store, wholesale distributor, testing laboratory)
    • For each permit or license, the issuing jurisdiction; the permit or license number; the expiration date (if any); and the activity covered by each current permit or license (e.g., general business operations; sale or manufacture of tobacco products or ENDS)
    • The brand name and a description of each product intended to be shipped by each sender or to each addressee
    • Whether any identified products or other intended shipments from each sender or to each addressee contain lithium batteries, nicotine, CBD, or tetrahydrocannabinol (‘‘THC’’)
    • For products containing nicotine or THC, the intended quantity of the product per shipment and the concentration of nicotine or THC
    • For products containing CBD with a THC concentration not exceeding 0.3 percent, whether the CBD derives from hemp
  • The guidance also includes recommendations applicable to entities that engage in testing, investigation, or research, as well as non-PACT Act prohibitions on the use of the U.S. mail applicable to CBD products, hazardous materials, and controlled substances and drug paraphernalia.
  • In anticipation of the flood of any applicable exception applications that can be expected upon the publication of the final rule, the USPS recognized the need to contemplate changes to its application process in the event that the exceptions are extended to ENDS. Ultimately, the Agency cautions that applicants should expect review of their applications to require substantial processing time, as the review requirements for ENDS sellers are likely to be far more complex than for traditional cigarette and smokeless tobacco sellers.

It would behoove ENDS manufacturers and distributors relying on the mail (or DHL, FedEx or UPS) to deliver products to their business partners to seek out alternative delivery options.

If you have any questions regarding PACT Act compliance for ENDS, contact Azim Chowdhury (chowdhury@khlaw.com). For more information about our Tobacco and E-Vapor Practice visit https://www.khlaw.com/evapor.

Photo of Azim Chowdhury Azim Chowdhury

Azim Chowdhury is a regulatory and public policy attorney with a focus on vapor, nicotine and tobacco product regulation. He is a Partner in Keller and Heckman’s nationally-ranked food and drug law practice.

Mr. Chowdhury advises domestic and foreign corporations in matters of…

Azim Chowdhury is a regulatory and public policy attorney with a focus on vapor, nicotine and tobacco product regulation. He is a Partner in Keller and Heckman’s nationally-ranked food and drug law practice.

Mr. Chowdhury advises domestic and foreign corporations in matters of Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and international regulatory compliance. In particular, he has developed expertise in tobacco and vapor product regulation relating to the implementation of the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act, and spearheaded the Tobacco and E-Vapor practice at Keller and Heckman. Specifically, Mr. Chowdhury has experience representing tobacco, e-cigarette and e-liquid manufacturers, distributors, retailers, suppliers and trade associations in matters of FDA, state and global regulatory compliance. He also assists corporations in establishing clearances for food and drug additives in the U.S., Canada, and European Union, with an emphasis on indirect additives used in food-contact materials.

Mr. Chowdhury has authored and edited numerous articles and publications, including Tobacco Regulation and Compliance: An Essential Resource, FDA Regulation of Tobacco: A Comprehensive Guide – An FDLI Primer and Tobacco and Nicotine Delivery: Regulation and Compliance, 2nd Edition. He is a frequent contributor to the Food and Drug Law Institute’s (FDLI) Update Magazine and has served on the Editorial Advisory Board of the Food and Drug Law Journal.  In addition, he has been interviewed in the U.S. News and World Reports Best Lawyers Edition (2016) and was named one of “10 Names to Know in the Vape World” in the October 2015 issue of Vape Magazine. Mr. Chowdhury received the 2018 National Law Review Go-To Thought Leadership Award for his consistent coverage of the emerging issues surrounding vaping and e-cigarettes on Keller and Heckman’s law blog, The Continuum of Risk.  As an industry leader, Mr. Chowdhury frequently speaks at industry conferences and events.

Mr. Chowdhury also has an active pro bono practice through Keller and Heckman’s Pro Bono Program, and has been featured in the Baltimore Sun for successfully obtaining asylum in the United States for a family who fled their home country of El Salvador because of violence they faced from an international gang.

Prior to entering private practice, he served as a judicial law clerk on the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. Mr. Chowdhury received a B.A. and B.S. from Johns Hopkins University, a MBA from the University of Maryland Robert H. Smith School of Business, and a JD, cum laude, from the University of Maryland School of Law.

Education: Johns Hopkins University (B.A., B.S., 2003); University of Maryland Robert H. Smith School of Business (M.B.A., 2006); University of Maryland School of Law (J.D., 2006, cum laude).

Admissions: District of Columbia; Maryland

Read more about Azim ChowdhuryEmailAzim's Linkedin ProfileAzim's Twitter Profile
Show more Show less
Photo of Galen D. Rende Galen D. Rende
Read more about Galen D. RendeEmailGalen's Linkedin Profile
  • Posted in:
    Administrative and Regulatory
  • Blog:
    The Continuum of Risk
  • Organization:
    Keller Heckman
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo