Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

FINRA Withdraws Proposed Expungement Rule Changes It Has Worked On For Four Years After Pushback From SEC

By Chris Seps on May 28, 2021
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Sorry for the flurry of posts this week, but the development Chris writes about here was not expected, and it is important enough that I decided to push it out today, on the eve of a three-day weekend. – Alan

Today FINRA announced in a press release here that it has withdrawn from SEC consideration its proposed rule changes regarding the expungement process.  The proposed rule changes were dramatic and included the creation of a special roster of arbitrators to decide expungement cases, and the appointment of arbitrators to expungement cases (rather than allowing the parties to choose them through the ranking process), as mentioned in these prior posts.

FINRA also pushed out a new webpage today devoted solely to expungement.  It includes key statistic about the numbers of expungements granted, as well as the proposed rules that have now been tabled.  The website indicates that the SEC clearly took issue with the proposed changes, as it required FINRA to respond to comments on three separate occasions (according to the timeline on this new website).

This development is significant, to say the least.  FINRA has been working on these rule changes since 2017, when it published Regulatory Notice 17-42.  Now, four years later, it is not clear where FINRA goes from here.  FINRA describes the withdrawal as “temporary” and vows to keep working to improve the expungement process.  It is too early to declare victory on either side, although PIABA has already done so  and seems to think FINRA will revise the proposed changes to make them even more harsh on brokers.  That may be true, but it may not.

For now, let’s all just enjoy the holiday weekend.

Chris Seps

Chris focuses his practice on complex litigation and arbitration in the securities and commodities industries. His securities practice involves handling both customer and industry disputes, as well as regulatory matters, involving issues of fraud, suitability, breach of contract, wrongful termination, negligence, defamation on…

Chris focuses his practice on complex litigation and arbitration in the securities and commodities industries. His securities practice involves handling both customer and industry disputes, as well as regulatory matters, involving issues of fraud, suitability, breach of contract, wrongful termination, negligence, defamation on a Form U-5, breach of fiduciary duty, negligent misrepresentations, and violations of state and federal securities laws. His commodities practice involves handling a wide variety of matters including issues of churning, fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, unauthorized trading, failure to supervise, and NFA arbitration. He has litigated matters in a variety of forums including FINRA arbitration, NFA arbitration, and AAA arbitration, and he has represented clients in both state and federal courts. Chris also has experience defending industry members against regulatory actions brought by FINRA and the NFA. His experience in both the securities and commodities industries has exposed him to a variety of industry and customer situations, as well as a variety of products, including tenancies in common (TICS), real estate investment trusts (REITS), auction rate securities (ARS), swaps, bonds, futures, options, variable annuities, private placements, and other derivatives.

Read more about Chris SepsEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Banking, Finance and Securities
  • Blog:
    Broker- Dealer Law Corner
  • Organization:
    UB Greensfelder LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo