Q. I’ve always heard that referral fees are forbidden. But I know lawyers who routinely refer cases for a share of the profit, even if they’re not licensed where the cases are pending. Isn’t this unethical?
A. Not if you do it right.
Strictly speaking, “referral fees” remain illegal in all but a few states like California and Virginia. Since you can’t give “anything of value” in return for a recommendation or referral, direct payments for either are forbidden in most jurisdictions.
In most jurisdictions, lawyers from different firms may split fees if they assume “joint responsibility” for the case, if the client agrees to it in writing, and if the total fee remains reasonable. Many states also require that the agreement disclose the share that each lawyer will receive.
Unless you intend to participate in the litigation itself, there is no requirement that you be admitted as pro hac vice counsel. In fact, there’s no requirement that you work on the case at all as long as you’re willing to take responsibility for it.
If you properly verify the qualifications of your co-counsel, and actively monitor their efforts, you may effectively “broker” a case to a lawyer outside of your firm. This is true even if you’re not licensed where the case is pending. Although most jurisdictions prohibit lawyers from splitting fees with non-lawyers, lawyers from different states may share fees if they follow the rules.
