Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

FTC, Under Pressure from “Tidal Wave” of HSR Filings, To Begin Issuing Close-At-Your-Own-Risk Letters

By Leo Caseria & Malika Levarlet on August 4, 2021
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Corporate-Investigations-2-Blog-Images-660x283

Many have been wondering when FTC and DOJ will resume granting early termination of the HSR waiting period in deals that present no anticompetitive concerns.  Early termination does not appear to be coming back anytime soon.

On August 3, 2021, the FTC announced that the “tidal wave” of HSR filings continues to strain its ability to investigate deals:  “This year, the FTC has been hit by a tidal wave of merger filings that is straining the agency’s capacity to rigorously investigate deals ahead of the statutory deadlines.”  See https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/blogs/competition-matters/2021/08/adjusting-merger-review-deal-surge-merger-filings?utm_source=govdelivery .  The data bear this out: HSR filings have been averaging around 300 per month, which, when annualized, is almost double the number of HSR filings of the busiest of the last ten years.

The FTC also announced  that when it investigates a deal, declines to issue a second request, but also feels like it did not have time to “fully investigate” the deal within the 30-day waiting period (or 60 days if there is pull-and-refile), it will issue a form letter warning the parties that the investigation remains open despite the expiration of the waiting period, and that the parties close at their own risk. It remains to be seen how frequently such letters will be issued.  Such letters might be issued only sparingly as an alternative to a second request in certain deals, or, might become a standard letter issued anytime a second request is not issued following an initial substantive antitrust inquiry. Of course, as always, the antitrust agencies retain the ability to investigate any deal at any time.  However, this announcement suggests that post-closing antitrust investigations, typically a rare event, might become more frequent in the future.

In light of this new form letter, parties should pay close attention to closing conditions.  For example, closing conditions triggered by expiration of the HSR waiting period would be satisfied even if the form letter is issued.  Conversely, closing conditions requiring that there be no open government investigations would not be satisfied if the form letter is issued.  In addition, provisions providing that buyers are not obligated to make divestitures or agree to conduct restrictions may offer less protection to buyers if the FTC’s announcement means that such events are more likely to occur post-closing.

Photo of Leo Caseria Leo Caseria

Leo Caseria is Co-Chair of both the firm’s Antitrust and Competition Practice Group and Governmental Practice and a partner in the Washington, D.C. and Los Angeles offices.

Read more about Leo CaseriaEmail
Photo of Malika Levarlet Malika Levarlet

Malika Levarlet is special counsel in the Corporate Practice Group in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office.

Read more about Malika LevarletEmail
  • Posted in:
    Antitrust, Competition and Trade
  • Blog:
    Corporate & Securities Law Blog
  • Organization:
    Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo