Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

CFPB Reaches Correct Resolution On Juneteenth Disclosure Issues

By Sherwin Root, David Sands, Moorari Shah & A.J. Dhaliwal on August 9, 2021
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Consumer-Finance-and-Fintech-Blog-Image-CapitolDC-660x283

When President Biden signed the bill on June 17 which made Juneteenth (June 19) a federal legal holiday immediately, it impacted certain Regulation Z timing requirements related to rescission of closed-end mortgage loans and the TILA-RESPA Integrated Disclosures (TRID), particularly with respect to transactions that either (i) closed on or before June 17, 2021 but for which consumers’ rescission periods had not yet expired or (ii) were close to the planned closing date on June 17, 2021 and subject to certain disclosure timing requirements of the TRID provisions.  Since the CFPB did not publish immediate guidance, mortgage lenders were forced to make educated guesses as to how to treat Friday, June 18 and Saturday, June 19, particularly with respect to measurement periods that had already commenced before or on the date the new law became effective.  On August 5 the CFPB published an interpretive rule on how to deal with these issues, and the Bureau consistently reached a result which permitted mortgage lenders to treat June 19 as either a business day or a federal holiday for the purposes of these provisions, as set forth immediately below in more detail.

  • In the context of the 2021 Juneteenth federal holiday and the affected closed-end rescission and TRID provisions, if the relevant time period began on or before June 17, 2021, then June 19. 2021 is a business day. If the relevant time period began after June 17, 2021, then June 19, 2021 is a federal holiday.  This is consistent with the specific business day definition set forth in 5 USC 6103(a).  Therefore, lenders did not have to worry about treating some loans that had their relevant time period commence on June 17 differently from other loans that had their relevant time periods commence on June 17, based on the time President Biden signed the new law.
  • For calculations of the rescission period, if the period commenced on or before June 17, then June 19 is a business day, but for compliance purposes a creditor may provide the consumer with a longer rescission period, so if the creditor treated June 19 as a federal holiday (and thereby ended the rescission period a day later), that will also be correct.  If the rescission period commenced on June 18, then June 19 should have been treated as a federal holiday.
  • For delivery of the Loan Estimate, creditors must deliver the LE to consumers or place it in the mail no later than seven business days before consummation of the transaction.  Again, if the delivery period began on or before June 17, then June 19 was a business day, but for compliance purposes the creditor may provide the LE earlier than seven business days before consummation, so if the creditor treated June 19 as a federal holiday (and thereby had the consummation period end a day later), that will also be correct.  If the delivery period commenced on June 18, then June 19 should have been treated as a federal holiday.
  • Regulation Z permits the creditor to provide the consumer with the Loan Estimate and the Closing Disclosure by mail if not delivered personally.  The applicable disclosure is deemed to have been received by the consumer three business days following its placement in the mail.  So if the disclosure was placed in the mail on or before June 17, then June 19 is treated as a business day for the purpose of when the disclosure is deemed received by the consumer, but the creditor will also be considered compliant if it treated June 19 as a federal holiday when calculating the deemed received date (and thereby had the deemed received date occur a day later).  If the disclosure was placed in the mail June 18, then June 19 should have been treated as a federal holiday when calculating the deemed received date.
  • Finally, Regulation Z provides that a revised LE must be received by the consumer no later than four business days prior to consummation, and a revised Closing Disclosure (CD) must be received no later than three business days prior to consummation.  While these measurement periods begin on the actual date of receipt, as opposed to the date of delivery, there is also a mail rule for delivery of these revised disclosures, so the consumer is considered to have received the revised LE or CD three business days after it is placed in the mail.  So, if the revised disclosure was placed in the mail on or before June 17, then June 19 would have been a business day for the purposes of the deemed received date, but once again, since creditors may provide the revised LE or CD earlier than required, if would also be correct for the creditor to treat June 19 as a federal holiday when calculating the deemed received date (and thereby had the deemed received date occur a day later). If the revised disclosure was placed in the mail on June 18, then June 19 should have been treated as a federal holiday when calculating the deemed received date.

If you have any questions relating to the foregoing, please contact David Sands, Moorari Shah, Sherwin Root or AJ Dhaliwal.

Photo of Sherwin Root Sherwin Root

Sherwin Root is an attorney in the Corporate Practice Group in the firm’s Los Angeles office.

Read more about Sherwin RootEmail
Photo of David Sands David Sands

David Sands is a partner and Leader of the Entertainment and Digital Media Team. He is also the former Practice Leader of the Firm’s Corporate Practice Group. David splits his time among the Firm’s Los Angeles, Orange County, and Century City offices.

Read more about David SandsEmail
Photo of Moorari Shah Moorari Shah

Moorari Shah is a partner in the Finance and Bankruptcy Practice Group in the firm’s Los Angeles and San Francisco offices.

Read more about Moorari ShahEmail
Photo of A.J. Dhaliwal A.J. Dhaliwal

A.J. is a partner in the Finance and Bankruptcy Practice Group in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office.

Read more about A.J. DhaliwalEmail
  • Posted in:
    Banking, Finance and Securities
  • Blog:
    Consumer Finance and Fintech Blog
  • Organization:
    Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo