Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherBrowse by ChannelAbout the NetworkJoin the NetworkProductsSub-MenuProducts OverviewBlog ProBlog PlusBlog PremierMicrositeSyndication PortalsAbout UsContactSubscribeSupport
Book a Demo
Search
Close

Contractor’s Guide to Biden’s Buy American Act Changes: Buy More (and More and More) American

By Ryan Boonstra & Casey J. McKinnon on August 17, 2021
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Made in USA

Elected officials in Washington, DC appear to have identified one topic that both parties can agree on—strengthening domestic content requirements on federal projects. In February 2021, we alerted contractors not only to Buy American Act changes previously implemented by the Trump administration but also to the potential changes addressed in a Biden administration executive order. Holding true to its word, the Biden administration recently issued a proposed rule that would make additional changes to an already complicated legal framework. Below are the key takeaways for contractors.

Takeaway #1

The proposed rule calls for increases to domestic content requirements (known as the component test). The Trump administration increased the requirement from 50% to 55%, and Biden’s proposed changes would eventually increase the requirement to as high as 75%. The increases would be imposed on a phased basis, raising immediately to 60%, then to 65% in 2024, and to 75% in 2029.

Takeaway #2

President Biden’s draft rule calls for a temporary waiver of the increased requirements when compliant materials are either unavailable or unacceptably expensive. Thus, until 2030, if materials meeting the increased domestic content requirements (whether 60%, 65%, or 75%) are unavailable or too expensive, a contractor will be permitted to use products that meet the current 55% threshold.

Takeaway #3

The proposed rule calls for higher price preferences for materials deemed to be critical or made up of critical components. However, the list of critical materials and the price preferences that apply to each material will be determined at a future date through a separate rule. Contractors should also note that under new FAR clauses (currently identified as 52.225-XX and 52.225-YY), awardees will be required to report the exact domestic content of critical materials and materials that contain critical components.

Takeaway #4

Finally, contractors should take note of what remains the same. Most notably, the proposed rule does not call for changes to the treatment of products that are the subject of trade agreements. Products from Canada, Japan, Germany, and other foreign countries will still be compliant in many cases. In addition, there is no change in the treatment of products that consist wholly of iron or steel, which will still be subject to a requirement that less than 5% of the cost of components come from foreign iron or steel.

While these changes are still merely proposed rules, there is likely to be confusion in the days ahead as contractors navigate an ever-changing set of requirements. Our Government Contracting Group is available to assist you with questions on these new regulations and any other government contracting matters.

Photo of Ryan Boonstra Ryan Boonstra

Ryan serves the firm’s clients in a wide variety of government contracting matters, including bid protests, small business matters, defense contracting, weapon development and research contracting, government construction, and matters relating to the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR). While in law school, he was…

Ryan serves the firm’s clients in a wide variety of government contracting matters, including bid protests, small business matters, defense contracting, weapon development and research contracting, government construction, and matters relating to the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR). While in law school, he was a summer associate in the firm’s Government Contracting Group.

Continue Reading

Read more about Ryan BoonstraEmailRyan's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
Photo of Casey J. McKinnon Casey J. McKinnon

Casey advises contractors on a broad range of federal contracting issues, including the filing of bid protests, interpretation of solicitation and contract provisions, resolution of disputes, and the preparation of contract claims and the litigation of appeals. He also counsels clients on complex…

Casey advises contractors on a broad range of federal contracting issues, including the filing of bid protests, interpretation of solicitation and contract provisions, resolution of disputes, and the preparation of contract claims and the litigation of appeals. He also counsels clients on complex questions concerning the intricacies of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), domestic preference requirements such as the Buy American Act and Trade Agreements Act, and day-to-day issues that arise from contract performance.

Continue Reading

Read more about Casey J. McKinnonEmailCasey's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Real Estate & Construction
  • Blog:
    Federal Construction Contracting Blog
  • Organization:
    Cohen Seglias Pallas Greenhall & Furman
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog, Inc. logo
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers
99 Park Row
  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Products
  • Blog Pro
  • Blog Plus
  • Blog Premier
  • Microsite
  • Syndication Portals
  • LexBlog Community
  • Resource Center
  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center
  • Blogging 101

New to the Network

  • Tennessee Insurance Litigation Blog
  • Claims & Sustains
  • New Jersey Restraining Order Lawyers
  • New Jersey Gun Lawyers
  • Blog of Reason
Copyright © 2025, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo