Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

A Pipeline Runs Through It: US Government Strikes Delicate Balance on Nord Stream 2 with New Executive Order, Four Sanctions Designations

By Dave Stetson, Nicholas Turner, Ed Krauland, Meredith Rathbone, Wendy Wysong & Peter Jeydel on August 23, 2021
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On August 20, 2021, the Biden administration issued a new Executive Order (“EO”) entitled “Blocking Property with Respect to Certain Russian Energy Export Pipelines.”  At the same time, the Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) added five entities and 13 vessels to the List of Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons (“SDN List”) under the new EO.

These developments – the latest in a series of US actions related to the Nord Stream 2 and TurkStream pipelines – suggest that the United States is attempting to strike a balance between formally opposing the Nord Stream 2 project and cooperating with major allies who favor the pipeline’s completion, such as Germany.  Importantly, the sanctions under the new EO are not as incrementally significant as they may seem: of the 18 new SDNs, all but four (two entities and two vessels) were already subject to sanctions under the Protecting Europe’s Energy Security Act of 2019 as amended (“PEESA”), which were imposed in May 2021 and were virtually identical to the new sanctions.  Rather than reflecting a more aggressive US stance in opposition to Nord Stream 2, the new EO appears to be driven primarily by legal technicalities including a limitation on the sanctions that could be imposed under PEESA.

Statutory Framework and Initial Sanctions

Under PEESA, the Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, is required to submit periodic reports to Congress identifying foreign persons and vessels that are involved in certain pipe-laying or related activities for the construction of the Nord Stream 2 and TurkStream pipelines.  PEESA also requires the President to exercise all powers granted under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (“IEEPA”) to block all property and property interests of the persons named in those reports that is within US jurisdiction.  The authority to impose blocking sanctions under PEESA is subject to certain exceptions including an exception for the importation of goods.

On May 19, 2021, the State Department announced that it had submitted a report to Congress as required by PEESA.  The report identified five entities, four vessels, and one individual involved in the construction of the Nord Stream 2 pipeline.  The Secretary of State waived the PEESA sanctions with respect to one entity and one individual (Nord Stream 2 AG and its CEO Matthias Warnig). The remaining four entities and four vessels, as well as several other vessels owned by one of the entities, were subject to mandatory sanctions under PEESA.

On May 21, 2021, acting solely under PEESA (not under IEEPA), OFAC then announced that three entities and eleven vessels would be added to the Non-SDN Menu-Based Sanctions List (“NS-MBS List”).  Each of the targets’ US property and property interests were blocked (apparently under the authority granted by subsection 7503(g)(1) of PEESA), but the continued importation of goods from the entities was allowed, as specified in PEESA.  The fourth entity subject to PEESA sanctions was already on the SDN List in relation to activities in Crimea, and OFAC added two of its vessels to the SDN List on May 21, 2021, as well.

New Executive Order

Drawing on IEEPA, the new EO fills in the authority OFAC was lacking to fully block the US property and property interests of the persons named in the State Department’s PEESA reports.  As the State Department observed in a statement and OFAC explained in a new FAQ, the new EO allows the United States to impose blocking sanctions that are not limited by PEESA’s exception relating to the importation of goods.  (It appears that IEEPA’s standard exemptions relating to informational materials and travel-related transactions will still apply with respect to the SDNs designated under the new EO.)

OFAC transferred the three entities and eleven vessels that were previously blocked solely under PEESA from the NS-MBS List to the SDN List as a result of the new EO.  Ultimately, only two new entities and two additional vessels were designated on August 20, 2021, under the new EO.

Conclusion

While the issuance of a new sanctions-related EO is often a major development, there is less than meets the eye when it comes to the new EO of August 20, 2021. The EO fine-tunes the pre-existing legal framework regarding Nord Stream 2 and TurkStream.  Moving forward, it is likely that additional designations under the new EO will be announced from time to time because PEESA still requires the State Department to submit periodic reports to Congress.

Please contact Steptoe’s Economic Sanctions team with any questions about these developments.

Photo of Ed Krauland Ed Krauland

Edward J. Krauland focuses on export controls/economic sanctions. Ed’s extensive experience includes representing clients on matters involving US and multilateral economic sanctions, defense and nuclear export controls, dual-use export controls under the EAR, anti-boycott compliance, internal investigations and enforcement work, and review of…

Edward J. Krauland focuses on export controls/economic sanctions. Ed’s extensive experience includes representing clients on matters involving US and multilateral economic sanctions, defense and nuclear export controls, dual-use export controls under the EAR, anti-boycott compliance, internal investigations and enforcement work, and review of government procurement regulations in the cross-border context. His practice spans all aspects of these laws, including counseling, compliance work, transactional advice, licensing and opinion work, internal reviews, disclosures, and enforcement actions. He has served as co-chair of the International Trade Committee of the ABA Section of International Law and Practice. He is former Chairman of an ABA-wide Task Force on Gatekeeper Regulation (anti-money laundering compliance), and senior adviser to the ABA Section of International Law and Practice’s anti-money laundering committee.

Read Ed’s full bio.

Read more about Ed KraulandEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Meredith Rathbone Meredith Rathbone

Meredith Rathbone focuses on export controls and economic sanctions, and has assisted clients in the energy, manufacturing, telecommunications, information security, banking, insurance, pharmaceutical, and service industries, among many others, in navigating the requirements of the Export Administration Regulations (EAR), International Traffic in Arms…

Meredith Rathbone focuses on export controls and economic sanctions, and has assisted clients in the energy, manufacturing, telecommunications, information security, banking, insurance, pharmaceutical, and service industries, among many others, in navigating the requirements of the Export Administration Regulations (EAR), International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) and US sanctions regulations administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) and US Department of State. She regularly assists companies in developing compliance policies, conducting internal investigations, performing training, and conducting due diligence in M&A transactions. She has represented individuals and companies facing civil and criminal investigations in this area, and has also represented clients in their efforts to be removed from OFAC’s list of Specially Designated Nationals (SDNs). She is a frequent writer and speaker on export controls and sanctions topics. She is the co-chair of the American Bar Association’s Export Controls and Economic Sanctions Committee, and also serves on the Sanctions Subcommittee of the State Department’s Advisory Committee on International Economic Policy.

Read Meredith’s full bio.

Read more about Meredith RathboneEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Peter Jeydel Peter Jeydel

Peter Jeydel‘s practice focuses on US export controls and economic sanctions, including the Commerce Department’s Export Administration Regulations (EAR), the State Department’s International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR), and sanctions regulations administered by the Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)…

Peter Jeydel‘s practice focuses on US export controls and economic sanctions, including the Commerce Department’s Export Administration Regulations (EAR), the State Department’s International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR), and sanctions regulations administered by the Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) and the State Department. His practice spans all aspects of these regimes, including counseling, compliance, transactional advice, licensing and opinions, disclosures, and enforcement actions. He has also represented companies and individuals seeking de-listing from OFAC’s sanctions list. In addition, Pete has assisted clients in anti-corruption matters, including under the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), and has experience handling reviews and investigations by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS).

Read Pete’s full bio.

Read more about Peter JeydelEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Energy and Utilities, Government and Public Policy
  • Blog:
    International Compliance Blog
  • Organization:
    Steptoe LLP

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo