Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Government Contracting Implications of Texas Senate Bill 19: Navigating State Regulation of Corporate Firearm Policies

By Maya Desai on September 20, 2021
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Adobe_stock_ 193579504_1200x627

Effective September 1, 2021, Texas Senate Bill 19 prohibits government entities from contracting with companies that have policies that restrict business with the firearms industry. The bill specifically targets banks and other financial institutions that have at least ten employees and are seeking government contracts of at least $100,000. Under the bill, such institutions are required to provide written verification that they do not have practices, policies, guidance, or directives that “discriminate” against a firearm entity or firearm trade association.

In 2018, several banks announced policies that set restrictions on the firearms industry after a shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida. For example, Citigroup announced that it would prohibit retailers that are customers of the bank from offering bump stocks or selling guns to individuals who have not passed a background check or are younger than twenty-one. That same year, Bank of America announced that it would stop making new loans to companies that make military-style rifles for civilian use. These policies will likely trigger enforcement of the bill, and both institutions risk losing government contracting opportunities in Texas.

Given the scope of Texas Senate Bill 19, companies with Environmental, Social, and Governance (“ESG”) policies should be especially mindful of the government contracting implications of the new legislation. ESG policies often limit participation in the firearms industry and would constitute “discrimination” against firearm entities such that enforcement of Texas Senate Bill 19 would be likely. Ultimately, the bill is one of many approaches intended to regulate ESG policies at the state level, and companies should expect similar measures in the future.

Key Takeaway: Companies with ESG policies should assess the impact of Texas Senate Bill 19 on their government contracting opportunities, and should expect and prepare for heightened state regulation of corporate firearm policies.

Contact Us

Husch Blackwell continues to monitor US government efforts regarding COVID-19 vaccinations and the federal workforce. Should you have any questions or require assistance in submitting a comment, please contact Maya Desai or a member of Husch Blackwell’s Government Contracts team.

Photo of Maya Desai Maya Desai

As part of the firm’s Government Contracts team, Maya researches a myriad of compliance measures and procedures that apply to biotech, professional services, construction, environmental remediation, security, informational technology and postal service contractors, among others. Maya enjoys helping clients ensure that domestic and…

As part of the firm’s Government Contracts team, Maya researches a myriad of compliance measures and procedures that apply to biotech, professional services, construction, environmental remediation, security, informational technology and postal service contractors, among others. Maya enjoys helping clients ensure that domestic and global businesses run smoothly in a highly regulated sector.

Email
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Government Contracts
  • Blog:
    The Contractor's Perspective
  • Organization:
    Husch Blackwell LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo