Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

BIS Imposes New Export Restrictions on Software for Biological Equipment

By Cortney Morgan, Grant Leach & Isabella Peek on October 13, 2021
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On October 5, 2021, the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security (“BIS”) published a final rule in the Federal Register that places new controls on software and technology that can potentially be used for manufacturing biological weapons. The rule comes after a decision in May 2021 by the forty-three (43) participant countries in the Australia Group (“AG”) to update the AG Common Control List to include biological equipment, technology and software that could be used to manufacture biological weapons.  The AG is an international organization made up of countries dedicated to the eradication of chemical and biological weapons.

BIS is implementing this rule by amending the Commerce Control List to add a new Export Control Classification Number (“ECCN”) 2D352. This new ECCN only applies to software that is (1) designed for nucleic acid assemblers and synthesizers described on the Common Control List; and (2) capable of designing and building functional genetic elements from digital sequence data. Specifically, ECCN 2D352 “applies to software that is designed for nucleic acid assemblers and synthesizers capable of designing and building functional genetic elements from digital sequence data.”  Software controlled under the new ECCN 2D352 requires a license for chemical and biological weapons (“CB”) and anti-terrorism (“AT”) reasons when exported, reexported or transferred (in-country) to the destination countries identified in CB Column 2 and AT Column 1.

Additionally, the final rule amends ECCN 2E001 to include export controls on the “technology” for the development of software controlled by the new ECCN 2D352.  Technology classified under ECCN 2E001 is controlled for CB and AT reasons and requires a license for export, reexport or transfer (in-country) to the destination countries identified in CB Column 2 and AT Column 1.

During the comment period certain interested parties expressed concern that the definition is too broad and that controls for these types of software should be implemented multilaterally. BIS rebuffed these comments explaining that the new ECCN 2D352 only applies to software that is designed for nucleic acid assemblers and synthesizers and that controls for this software are multilateral since they are being implemented by all Australia Group member states.  These new licensing requirements will likely apply to labs, life science companies, universities and research institutions engaged in research that involves such software and related development technology.

Husch Blackwell monitors changes to the Commerce Control List and licensing restrictions for exports under the Export Administration Regulations and will provide updates as relevant changes occur.  Should you have any questions or concerns relating to these recent changes and additions to the Commerce Control List, please contact Cortney Morgan, Grant Leach or Tony Busch of our Export Controls and Economic Sanctions team.

Photo of Cortney Morgan Cortney Morgan

An experienced attorney in the area of international trade and supply chain issues, Cortney advises foreign and domestic clients on all aspects of international trade regulation, planning and compliance, including import (customs), export controls, economic sanctions, embargoes, international trade agreements and preference programs.

Read more about Cortney MorganEmailCortney's Linkedin Profile
Photo of Grant Leach Grant Leach

Grant focuses his practice on international trade, international compliance, securities, mergers, acquisitions and general corporate matters.

Read more about Grant LeachEmailGrant's Linkedin Profile
Photo of Isabella Peek Isabella Peek

A love for international law drew Isabella to Georgetown Law and ultimately to Husch Blackwell.

Isabella’s early career experience working across the United States (D.C., Chicago, Reno, Omaha, Carson City), and experience studying abroad in England and Italy, solidified her ambition to work

…

A love for international law drew Isabella to Georgetown Law and ultimately to Husch Blackwell.

Isabella’s early career experience working across the United States (D.C., Chicago, Reno, Omaha, Carson City), and experience studying abroad in England and Italy, solidified her ambition to work with clients worldwide. Her passion for international issues is what first drew her to Georgetown Law School, and it later made Husch Blackwell a logical next career step.

Isabella’s skill and ambition made her a formidable competitor on the equestrian team in college, giving her the opportunity to build a high level of self-discipline and contribute to the success of a team. Her time management abilities helped Isabella perform at a high level both academically and as an equestrian. It’s that kind of accomplishment and organization that make her such an effective partner for clients and businesses around the globe.

Email
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Administrative and Regulatory, Government and Public Policy
  • Blog:
    International Trade Insights
  • Organization:
    Husch Blackwell LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo