Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
CommunitySub-MenuPublishersChannelsProductsSub-MenuBlog ProBlog PlusBlog PremierMicrositeSyndication PortalsAboutContactResourcesSubscribeSupport
Join
Search
Close

FTC to “Ramp Up Enforcement” on Subscription Services

By Timothy Butler, Keith J. Barnett & Carlin McCrory on November 8, 2021
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Financial Services Litigation_1200x600_0007_GettyImages-1266762334

On October 28, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issued a new policy statement on autorenewal and negative option marketing.

As its press release title indicates, the FTC intends to “ramp up enforcement” against companies offering subscription services via an autorenewal or negative option offer. Signaling its primary concerns, the FTC’s policy statement focuses on three points:

  1. Clear and Conspicuous Disclosures. Any autorenewal or negative option offer should clearly and conspicuously disclose all material terms, including the price, whether the price will increase after a trial period, any recurring charges, the deadline for the consumer to stop the charges, payment submission date(s) for each charge, and all information necessary to cancel the contract.
  1. Express and Informed Consumer Consent. A company offering an autorenewal or negative option should obtain the consumer’s express and informed consent, which should be obtained separately from any other consents and not obtained via any detracting or contradictory language that muddles the consumer’s ability to give informed consent.
  1. Ease of Cancellation. A company offering an autorenewal or negative option should provide the consumer with a simple and efficient mechanism to cancel the subscription and offer that mechanism via the same media (e.g., mobile application or website) that the consumer used to enroll in the subscription plan.

FTC Bureau of Consumer Protection Director Samuel Levine said: “Today’s enforcement policy statement makes clear that tricking consumers into signing up for subscription programs or trapping them when they try to cancel is against the law.”

The press release further notes that the FTC has brought cases challenging a variety of illegal subscription practices. The FTC has sued companies that hid important payment information, that made consumers wait on hold or listen to lengthy ads before they could cancel, that converted free trials to paid subscriptions before the free trial ended, and that failed to disclose that widely advertised material benefits of the subscription were no longer available.

Our Take. The FTC’s press release and policy statement signal again that U.S. consumer protection agencies intend to ramp up enforcement of the laws and regulations that govern autorenewal and negative option marketing.

Photo of Timothy Butler Timothy Butler
Email Timothy's Linkedin Profile
Photo of Keith J. Barnett Keith J. Barnett

Keith Barnett is a litigation, investigations (internal and regulatory), and enforcement attorney with more than 15 years of experience representing clients in the financial services and professional liability industries.

Read more about Keith J. BarnettEmail Keith's Linkedin Profile
Photo of Carlin McCrory Carlin McCrory

Carlin is a regulatory, compliance, and payments attorney with experience representing financial institutions, fintechs, lenders, debt collectors, payment processors, neobanks, virtual currency companies, and mortgage servicers.

Read more about Carlin McCroryEmail
  • Posted in:
    Civil Litigation, Corporate Compliance
  • Blog:
    Regulatory Oversight
  • Organization:
    Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog, Inc. logo
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers
99 Park Row
  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Products
  • Blog Pro
  • Blog Plus
  • Blog Premier
  • Microsite
  • Syndication Portals
  • LexBlog Community
  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center

New to the Network

  • Boston ERISA & Insurance Litigation Blog
  • Stridon News and Insights
  • Taft Class Action & Consumer Insights
  • Labor and Employment Law Insights
  • Age of Disruption
Copyright © 2022, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo